After placing the art you are viewing on a timeline, the next step is to build up a sense of time and place that is specific to the artwork and artist.

• Did the artists have friends or contemporaries that may have influenced the style of the work?
• Did the artist have a teacher?
• Did the artist write about their work?
• What materials were available to the artist?
• Was the artist male or female?
• Might race or other specifics of the artists' identity play a role?
• Did the artwork get shown in public? What were the reactions of the first viewers?

The way we interact and understand art is dependent on how the narrative of art history has been produced.

For example, art flourished during the Renaissance. One of the main sources about artists of this time comes from the book 'Lives of the Artists', written by Italian Giorgio Vasari during the 16th-century. Vasari draws a similarity between the passage of time and the artistic achievement of Italian artists. In writing about his fellow countrymen, Vasari wanted to promote the Italian Renaissance to the elevated position of high-achievement in all of art history.

The idea that art is about progress is appealing to historians because it gives a simple linear-narrative framework. But this view tends to be exclusive in that it views Western art as the main story of art history without considering Islamic art, Turkish art, Japanese art, or West Africa's art.

Vasari was an Italian living in Florence and interested in how the art around him was made. We should remember that all art history is tilted with a bias towards the storytelling.