Deconstruction is not destruction. The concept or object is still there. To think deconstructively is not only to question accepted truths but to ask in whose interests it is if they are accepted.

Jacques Derrida was fascinated by the many factors that went into constructing a concept and the final act of construction itself: the belief that any concept is coherent and has a single fixed meaning and that this meaning is true, pure and unconstructed. He called the belief that coherence is a measure of truth, the 'metaphysics of presence'.

A text can be anything, a book, a movie, a recording.

• Start by finding a silent space.
• Next, find something to deconstruct: a poem, a timetable, a shopping list, philosophy, this text.
• Start deconstructing. How is the text regarded? Question accepted truths, and in whose interest it is that they are accepted.
• Look for places within the text that contradict each other. (Films may provide ample examples.)
• Don't listen to what the author says. Trust your own analysis of a text.

• Derrida thought there was no true assessment of a text. The dominant assessment tells us about the conditions around the text rather than the text itself.
• To think like Derrida means looking at a text, finding what it is trying to promote, then looking in the opposite direction.
• Look for contradictions and consider what they mean.
• A more subtle way of looking at a text is to see what happens if you look at one text through another interpretation. (What role does race play in the Marvel movies?)

The words and concepts we use, including the words in our mind we mistake for thinking, emerge from the culture around us.

No work can be pure in itself. Deconstruction is always happening in any work, and looking closely reveals how a text is happening and how the creator has pretended it isn't. For example, books like Landscape With Landscape (1985) by Gerald Murnane continually draw the readers' attention to the fact that they're reading a novel but can't just get lost in the story.