It’s a thinking model at worst. Beware of Unequal Comparison in ThinkingI wanted to highlight the problem of a fundamental fallacy, beyond the logical fallacy recognized in a dictionary for logical thinkingSomething that many of them unaware, who insist on defending their views which they thought it's reasonable, even though they were just imagining things.Basically, looking for the truth is looking for the possibility (there is) the truth.

Thinking Model At Worst

What is your standard of truth? The standard of truth of people living on the "bezelbug bradiboy" planet or the standardization of the "local" community?MORE SIMPLE. What is your standard of testing correctness?Impossible standardization?What model clone are you using? IN BRIEF, REALISTIC OR UNREALISTIC MODELS?This thinking model will be an imitation.

Standardization

What if the ethical model you use is taken from the ethics prevailing in other countries? It could be irrelevant. Does that mean misguided thinking? NO!Relevant thinking models? No. Doesn’t a relevant thinking model mean a realistic thinking model? Yes, but also still less realistic.So? Relevant thinking is still less realistic? Yes! What does this mean?

Relevancy

To test means to compare the tested with the standard of truth.So, every time you test something, of course you involve standardization. As simple as that.My question is, what is your standard of truth? We are not talking (involving) religion. We are talking on an axiomatic basis.

Testing is Making Comparison

That in the end finding certainty, that’s another story, but the main mission is exploring the possibility.If it is possible then it can be confirmed. If it is possible 0.9, then it could be rounded to 1 certainty.That’s what we do next. Trying to believe, again & again.The question? What is the basis for our thinking that something is worthy to belief? That’s a lot, but that’s not what’s underlined.

Raise Confident

Yes, because even though your way of thinking is relevant, it makes sense, it’s been this & that’s it, but it’s still not realistic! What? ️Yep. You're not realistic if you are not completely realistic! Sorry, this isn't a philosophical statement like "the more you know the less you know" or something like "content but empty, empty but full". It's not philosophical game either.Again, you're not realistic if you are not completely realistic!Regardless of whether you are relevant or not, reasonable or not, but as long as it is realistic, it means realistic. Huh, is this a paradox? Not really

How Realistic

What is the wisdom behind this? Simple. That when you deny something, something must have absolutely no trace, no trace of its truth, nothing in any way to trace its possibility, not the slightest hint of its possibility in reality. NO SIGN CONNECTED TO " ...." WHICH YOU THOUGHT WAS IMPOSSIBLE!SO IF THERE WERE TRACE, THERE WERE SIGNS TOWARDS SOMETHING POSSIBLE, THEN IT IS OK TO BELIEVE IN THE POSSIBILITY OF SOMETHING.

THE CORE

What model do you use to think?<ul><li class="ql-align-justify">A simple example ... you want to renovate a house. What house model do you want to apply?</li><li class="ql-align-justify">You want to shave your hair? What hairstyle would you like to imitate?</li></ul>Yes, THINKING MODELS! A simple but forgotten concept then plunges them into imaginary concepts. DREAM MODE ON. THEY USE AN IMAGINATION MODEL, NOT EARTHING, NOT REALISTIC.

Imitating

It is always necessary to have a realistic comparison model!If you deny that there is no Creator - God, even though your own reasoning admits that for “a product” there needs to be a maker. Then they (atheists) argued "yes, it’s clear someone made this stuff, but we didn’t know who made this planet". THIS IS WHAT I CALL THEM ATHEISTS DELUSION. THEIR MODEL IS NOT REALISTIC.They reject something with unclear comparisons, while realistic models (miniature reasoning) show that something has a maker.

Unequal Comparison

It’s like someone trying to think of a form of impossibility. Whereas there has never been an example or there is no trace of a piece called impossibility. Even if you say "something is impossible", that is the opposite of the possible reality (there is a reality involved here).<ul><li class="ql-align-justify">Or we pull it away from reality. “Can you imagine nothingness without being aware of something?” Nope!</li><li class="ql-align-justify">Again ... , statements like this ... "can you eat " ..... " to "...."? Confused aren’t you! You must have guessed the probability through your experience to be "can you eat " what you can eat " until "full up blah blah?</li></ul>

Confusion

Worse? They are trapped by their own game, like mathematicians fiddling with formulas. That’s the philosopher who tinkers with meaning and then trapped himself into atheism.Furthermore the atheist maestro (Richard Dawkins) or whoever successors have been able to master stirring up reasoning, sophism & various other chaotic movement that are able presenting beautiful harmony? But it turned out that the music they played was an orchestra in a dream. Their claims are so unrealistic.They're unrealistic because they are not completely realistic...!!!If you understand this, you will laugh

Trapped

Or more unrealistic..."can " .... " "...." then "...." and "...." so that "...."? Difficult isn’t it! Why? Because there are no traces. There are no cheat sheets, there is not even the slightest cheat. HOW CAN YOU ENSURE THE POSSIBILITY OF "...." "...."?

Unrealistic

Let’s try to turn thoughts around without getting dizzy. We try to twist the meaning, change the meaning of words, without losing the common thread. Without losing the basic structureIf irrelevant means unrealistic? Then as long as it’s realistic, it means that it’s realistic even if it doesn’t make sense? Does that mean “doesn’t make sense” can be realistic? Yes!Then how can something unrealistic be relevant?This is how most philosophers play with words, tricking others.

Twisting Words

There’s no way you’d want to prove the existence of "dancing cakes" without an example from the world of cake.Likewise, when you want to prove the existence of God, of course you need initial information that allows for the existence of God.If you want to find out the possibility of someone doing "ianyiss&=lv’/!kg", then try to find out whether there is an example or not? At least if there is "ianyiss&=lv’/!kg", then there is "ianyiss&=lv’/!kgiroonti_i=lv’/!kgonhnoio_ianyiss&=lv’/!kgoihii_i&=lv’/!kg"is also possible.If you want to prove something true, at least there is an example in reality.

Comparison

Someone asked "can we draw something unique that is unthinkable"? Of course it’s impossible. Even if it was possible, it would have been thought of by the others and then shared with the questionerSo it is not something that is unthinkable, but, it has not been thought of, it's already exists but has not yet reached our minds. We cannot possibly think of something that is absolutely beyond thought.

Weirdo

I wanted to highlight the problem of a fundamental fallacy, beyond the logical fallacy recognized in a dictionary for logical thinking Something that most unaware by many of them who insist on…

philosophy

Philosophy

THINKING DELUSION

Sines, cosines,and logarithms do have actual value. What they are is that they are ways to show how these basic building blocks of reasoning can be used to deduce surprising things or difficult things. In some sense they're like the historical coverages of the triumphs of mathematics, so one cannot just talk abstractly about “yes let's talk about mathematical logic”.One reason mathematics is difficult to understand is actually because of that network of prerequisites. Math is one of these strange subjects for which the concepts are chained in sequences of dependencies.

Sequence of Dependencies

Being a math person does not means to recite the formulas between the sines, cosines, tangents and to use logarithms and exponentials interchangeably. That's not necessarily what to think everyone should try to concentrate to understand. The main things to concentrate to understand the mathematical principles of reasoning.

Reasoning Principal

When you have long chains there are very few starting points—very few things need to memorize. In mathematics, you have very few that you memorize and the rest you deduce as you go through, and this chain of deductions is actually what's critical. The difference between math and other subjects; Math has fewer concepts but they're chained deeper. And because of the way that we usually learn when you had deep chains it's very fragile because you lose any one link—meaning if you miss a few concepts along the chain you can actually be completely lost.

Connection of Mathematics 

The education often works where it's almost like riding a train from a beginning to an end, well it's such that if you have a hole somewhere in your track the train is not going to pass that hole.The way to help to address this is to provide a way for everyone to learn at their own pace and in fact to fill in the holes whenever they are sensed. Everyone is a math person, and all that one has to do is to go through the chain and fill in all the gaps, and you will understand it better than all the other subjects actually.

Learn your own pace

Professor Po-Shen Loh talked about mathematical reasoning and learning process that anyone can be found in math.

productivity

Productivity

education

Learning & Education

problemsolving

Problem Solving

Anyone Can Be a Math Person Once They Know the Best Learning Techniques

Reflective practice helps you to improve and develop. It involves deliberately analysing your experiences and actions.
For example:
<ul>
<li>An athlete thinks about what mistakes they made during a training session, then consider ways to avoid those mistakes in the future.</li>
<li>A student reflects on how they studied for a test, how they performed, and then figure out how to study more effectively.</li>
</ul>

Reflective practice is vital for improvement

Two concepts that are considered in relation to reflective practice are:
<ul>
<li>Reflexivity - people's ability and tendency to display general self-awareness,</li>
<li>Critical reflection - an in-depth type of reflection, which is being aware of how your assumptions affect you, and examining your actions and responsibilities from moral, ethical, and social perspectives.</li>
</ul>

Related concepts to reflective practice

The most notable benefits are:
<ul>
<li>Acquisition of new knowledge.</li>
<li>Refinement of existing knowledge.</li>
<li>A better understanding of the connections between theory and practice.</li>
<li>A greater understanding of the rationale behind your actions.</li>
<li>Improvement of your goals.</li>
<li>A clearer understanding of yourself.</li>
<li>Increased feelings of competence.</li>
<li>High motivation to act.</li>
<li>Improved performance.</li>
</ul>

Benefits of reflective practice

The reflective cycle is a process that guides reflective practice through the following steps:
<ol>
<li>Describe what happened without judgment or analysis.</li>
<li>Define how you felt, what you were thinking, and how you feel now, but without judgment.</li>
<li>Evaluate everything that happened, the good and the bad.</li>
<li>Analyse the situation to make sense of everything that occurred.</li>
<li>Draw conclusions based on the information you gathered so far.</li>
<li>Figure out what you will do differently next time.</li>
</ol>

Graham Gibbs' reflective cycle

There are three main types of reflection:
<ol>
<li>Anticipatory reflection: Reflection that's performed before an event occurs involves asking what might happen, possible challenges, how you can prepare and how you should respond. </li>
<li>Reflection in action: Reflection that you do while an event is happening - asking whether things are going as expected, how you're feeling.</li>
<li>Reflection after action: Reflection that you carry out after an event has occurred.</li>
</ol>

Types of reflection

A shared reflective activity can take various forms, such as discussing your experiences with other people or having someone with expertise ask you guiding questions to help you reflect.
A shared reflective practice can be beneficial as a group might help to identify more issues that individuals would fail to notice. But the process can also be more stressful for shy people.

Reflective practice as a shared activity

<ul>
<li>Start by explaining the concept of reflective practice.</li>
<li>Explain the benefits of reflective practice.</li>
<li>Explain how to engage in reflective practice.</li>
</ul>
Once you've done this, create an environment conducive to reflective practice while keeping in mind that different people will benefit from different approaches. For example, some people may benefit from having someone helping them through each stage of the reflection cycle, while others may do it independently.

How to encourage reflective practice in others

There are different approaches to reflective practice. One way to engage in reflective practice is to ask guiding questions. In the context of a recent event, ask yourself:
<ul>
<li>How did I feel while the event was happening?</li>
<li>What were my goals?</li>
<li>What were the key things I did?</li>
<li>What went well?</li>
<li>What did not work?</li>
<li>What should I do the same way next time?</li>
<li>What should I change next time?</li>
</ul>
You can also engage in reflective practice through reflective writing, which can take various forms.

How to engage in reflective practice

Self-distancing may be beneficial to help in the reflection process.
<ul>
<li>Ask yourself what advice you would give someone else if they were in your situation?</li>
<li>Avoid first-person language when considering your performance (Ask yourself, "what could you have done differently?" instead of "what could I have done differently?)</li>
<li>Try to visualise the events you were in from the perspective of other people involved.</li>
</ul>

Using self-distancing to help reflection

personaldevelopment

Personal Development

health

Health

Reflective Practice: Thinking About the Way You Do Things - Effectiviology

<ol><li>Vision: they use a mix of logic and creativity to define ambitious but rigorous visions of what needs to be achieved. </li><li>Framework: taking into account their own biases, timeline and resources, they can define their objectives and develop multiple action plans.</li><li>Perceptiveness: they observe and understand the world from all the different perspectives. </li><li>Assertiveness: They’re good at evaluating, deciding and promptly executing their decisions without letting doubts fog their vision. </li><li>Flexibility: they seek advice to compensate for their weaknesses and then twist their ideas and framework to achieve their goals. But they are flexible without breaking the rules. </li><li>Emotional Balance: they are aware and balance their emotions so as to favor the achievement of their goals. </li><li>Patience: they understand that most achievements are a long-term endeavor involving various milestones and a lot of effort. </li></ol>

7 Characteristics Of Strategic Thinkers

Defined as the process that determines the manner in which people think about, assess, view, and create the future for themselves and others. It’s a combination of mindset and techniques that determines one’s ability to know their goal and how to achieve it.Strategic thinkers are highly sought after for leadership positions and are able to imagine the big picture, identify the possible impact of their decisions and project the way to get there.

Strategic Thinking

"Your attitude, not your aptitude, will determine your altitude."

"The two most powerful warriors are patience and time"

In a study conducted by Harvard Bussiness Review, a 97% of the 10,000 senior executives selected, chose strategy as the most critical leadership behavior to their organizations' future success. Achievement is open to strategic thinkers. These are the seven traces that define them all.

leadershipandmanagement

Leadership & Management

The 7 Critical Skills Of Successful Strategic Thinkers

<ul><li>Why is this important?</li><li>What are the long-term and short-term goals?</li><li>Who are the stakeholders and why are they so?</li><li>What biases influence the situation?</li><li>What are the fundaments behind our premises?</li><li>What are the consequences?</li><li>What is the plan and why is it so?</li><li>What are the resources available?</li><li>Which strategic analysis model do we apply?</li><li>What are the accountabilities? Does the culture encourage 360-degree accountability? How?</li><li>When it comes to performance management, what are our common standards for behavior?</li><li>What is the most powerful thing to do tomorrow to build/execute/advance the organizational and/or operational strategy? Why? </li></ul>

Questions a strategic thinker might make

It sounds simple enough: Hire and promote the best among us. Do what you must to entice high performers who are competent in areas of leadership, strategy, strategic thinking, etc.

THINKING DELUSION

Anyone Can Be a Math Person Once They Know the Best Learning Techniques

Reflective Practice: Thinking About the Way You Do Things - Effectiviology

It's time to
Read like a Pro.

The 7 Critical Skills Of Successful Strategic Thinkers

CURATED BY

THINKING DELUSION

Anyone Can Be a Math Person Once They Know the Best Learning Techniques

Reflective Practice: Thinking About the Way You Do Things - Effectiviology

It's time to Read like a Pro.

The 7 Critical Skills Of Successful Strategic Thinkers

CURATED BY

It's time to
Read like a Pro.