1. First spacecraft to study a star - Our Sun.&nbsp;The Parker solar probe, launched on August 11, 2018 is a part of NASA’s ‘Living With a Star’ program.&nbsp;This probe will attempt to study two sections of the Sun: the corona and its atmosphere.2. First mission to be named after living person.&nbsp;The Parker solar probe gets its name from physicist Eugene Parker, who provided concepts to the energy generating capabilities of stars.3.Closest distance of any spacecraft from Sun. This distance will reduce to 3.8 million miles (6.12 million km) by the final orbits of the Parker spacecraft around the sun.

The Fastest Ever Man-made Machine.

#shorts #facts #space #parkersolarprobe 3 facts about The Parker Solar Probe : The Fastest ever Man-made machine. 1. First spacecraft to study a star - Our Sun. The Parker solar probe, launched on August 11, 2018 is a part of NASA’s ‘Living With a Star’ program. This probe will attempt to study two sections of the Sun: the corona and its atmosphere. 2. First mission to be named after living person. The Parker solar probe gets its name from physicist Eugene Parker, who provided concepts to the energy generating capabilities of stars. 3.Closest distance of any spacecraft from Sun For most of its studies, the Parker probe will maintain a distance of around 15 million miles (24.15 million km) away from the Sun’s surface. This distance will reduce to 3.8 million miles (6.12 million km) by the final orbits of the Parker spacecraft around the Sun, expected around the end of 2024, where it will attain a speed of 430,000 miles per hour (692,000 km per hour). Know more about… Space : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO6kTsDI4xfnAISJIMWKxkPoL9qoU9Hwv General knowledge : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO6kTsDI4xfn6hHfyZBGiw-atw0its-7Q Science & Technology : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO6kTsDI4xfmONVgfMhMbstBLpZuyJCP2 Health : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO6kTsDI4xflrlYCGE0EIyWXoBoNG81-r 🙏Requests🙏 I requested to you (My viewers) please subscribe to my channel and if you like video then please press like button.All youtubers are doing hard work in video making and your like, Share, Subscribes are fruits for our hard works. You also follow me on: - Facebook: www.facebook.com/thetechers You can visit my Website : www.knowledgevaccination.blogspot.com This video is under Fair Use: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act in 1976; Allowance is made for "Fair Use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non - profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All rights and credit go directly to its rightful owners. No copyright infringement intended. Sound credit : Hitman movie Video Credit : NASA / NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Thank you all of you...🙏

Space

3 facts about The Parker Solar Probe : The Fastest ever Man-made machine. #shorts

Back in 1987, world leaders came together to ban chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are the chemicals associated with the gigantic, gaping hole in the ozone layer that persisted for decades.And it’s a good thing that they did. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03737-3.epdf?sharing_token=dPEMwLCaxQzte3_623vJ5tRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NaY7jKBgX26XZGgdJlDo_9SKenh9py1_axDwbZW9FSGm4XRFpXmL3si5jhZtYb82nQDzdzcru6GTCMC5dYhUOkAPryxCfSxaMXHFbuBXENimraaDqLfkxf_XZ5bSyrQiHkvXVEoumPiaiqhu3fwgEFlA_plaDtGvItYxA9kn6UBg%3D%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.bbc.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Research </a>published in the journal Nature on Wednesday found that a world in which the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer treaty never happened, the planet would be in horrible shape. In the present-day of that hypothetical world, we would already be living through some of the worst-case, nightmare scenarios.

Timely Decision Helps Save Global Climate Crisis.

A new analysis of the environmental impact of the 1987 ban on CFCs found that it bought us crucial time to stave off the worst of climate change.

Living Life, Good.

Study: A 1987 Chemical Ban Saved the Planet

We usually think of solar, or photovoltaic (PV), cells fixed to roofs, converting sunlight into electricity, but bringing that technology indoors could further boost the energy efficiency of buildings and energize swaths of wireless smart technologies such as smoke alarms, cameras and <a href="https://techxplore.com/tags/temperature+sensors/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">temperature sensors </a>, also called Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Now, a study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) suggests that a straightforward approach for capturing <a href="https://techxplore.com/tags/light/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">light </a>indoors may be within reach.

Now Solar Tech Can Power Smart Devices Indoors.

Common solar tech can power smart devices indoors

The Apollo 11 moon landing on July 20, 1969 was one of the most astonishing achievements in human history. That day, an estimated 530 million TV viewers watched U.S. astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin take their first steps on the moon . Afterward, the two men and third crew member Michael Collins flew safely back to Earth and landed in the Pacific Ocean.

Introduction

Yet just a few years later, some people claimed the "giant leap for mankind" had been faked.Conspiracy theories that the moon landing was actually a hoax that the U.S. government had staged to win the space race with the Soviets began to gain traction in the mid-1970s.Although these claims were false and easily debunked, they have persisted to this day.Most of the deniers' "proof" is based on perceived anomalies in the images transmitted back to Earth from the moon's lunar surface.

If you look at the American flag in still pictures from the Apollo 11 mission, it appears to be flapping in the wind.But how can that be, since there's no wind on the moon?The simple answer is, it isn't flapping, Fienberg says.That's because it isn't an ordinary flag.If the astronauts had planted a regular flag on the moon, it would've hung slack like flags do on Earth when there's no wind.The Apollo 11 astronauts had trouble extending the rod all the way, and in still pictures, this creates a ripple effect that makes the flag look like it's waving in the wind.

American Flag Looks Like It Is Flapping In The Wind

"One of the first arguments I heard and one of the easiest to debunk…is the fact that there are no stars in the lunar sky," Fienberg says."All of the exposures of the astronauts on the moon are daylight exposures,"."The surface was brightly illuminated [from the sun].And the astronauts are wearing bright white space suits that are highly reflective."The exposure on the astronauts' cameras was too short to capture the space suits and the moon's surface while also capturing the comparatively dimmer stars.The same thing happens if you go onto someone's back porch at night and turn on the lights.

You Can’t See The Stars

In images from the moon landing, it is possible to see certain objects even though they are in shadow.Skeptics argue that if the sun were the only source of light, this wouldn't be the case.Therefore, the fact that you can see some objects in shadow must be the result of special Hollywood lighting.The problem with this theory is that although the sun is the main source of illumination on the moon, it isn't the only source of illumination.

The Shadows Aren’t Right

In one of the pictures from the moon landing, you can see Armstrong clearly reflected in Aldrin’s visor. Some skeptics have pointed out that Armstrong does not appear to be holding a camera, so someone else must be taking the picture. But that isn’t true.Armstrong couldn’t walk around the moon with a regular hand-held camera. In his bulky suit, he needed something that was easy to manipulate. The camera he used on the moon was mounted on the front of his suit, which is where his hands are in the reflection.

You Can’t See Armstrong’s Camera

Director Stanley Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey wowed audiences in 1968 for creating a realistic image of outer space.It was so compelling that some conspiracy theorists later wondered if the government had actually hired Kubrick to film the moon landing in a soundstage (possibly like the one James Bond ran through in the 1971 film Diamonds Are Forever).The thing is, the moon landing footage didn't look real because Kubrick filmed it—Kubrick's movie 2001 looked real because Kubrick enlisted astronomical artists and aerospace engineers to help him with it.

Stanley Kubrick Filmed It

The only “evidence” that Kubrick filmed the moon landing has itself proved to be a hoax.Denial of America’s great progress in space exploration and belief in these myths is “more of an ideological thing—a political thing—than it is a scientific thing,” Fienberg notes.To those who know the moon landing was real, conspiracy theories that it was a hoax may seem silly and innocuous. But their consequences aren’t: they spread misinformation, make people susceptible to other false theories and could earn you a punch from Buzz Aldrin.

The Apollo 11 moon landing on July 20, 1969 was one of the most astonishing achievements in human history. That day, an estimated 530 million TV viewers watched

Mind-blowing Facts

The Wildest Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories, Debunked

NASA is surely on the cutting edge of technology, as its research and development take them literally out of this world. Fortunately, its innovation is not exciting only in space; as NASA seeks to make space travel easier, safer, and more sustainable, the technology it develops is also useful and in use right here on the ground. Technologies originally developed in pursuit of exiting the atmosphere now help us address some of the biggest challenges we face on Earth. Here are eight examples of NASA technologies bettering our planet today.

Space Technology, Also Bettering Our Planet On The Ground.

The manufacture of prosthetics was previously done by casting them in plaster and corn starch molds, which are difficult to ship and easily broken. The Harshberger Prosthetic &amp; Orthotic Center looked to NASA for an answer and found that the foam insulation developed to cover the external tank of a space shuttle — lighter, stronger, and more easily machined than plaster, not to mention less expensive. This ultimately reduced the cost of artificial limbs for patients and enabled mass production of foam “blanks” that can be shipped to prosthetic makers.

Space Technology Contributes To Make Artificial Limbs.

In the past, if a mammogram x-ray produced a trouble spot, a doctor would perform a biopsy that required them to cut into the breast for a tissue sample. Technology developed for the Hubble Space Telescope, however, allows biopsies to be performed with just a needle. An advanced, super sensitive version of charged coupled devices — silicon chips that convert light into electronic or digital images — were initially installed in the Hubble Telescope in 1997 and shortly adopted for a new breast biopsy system. The device allows more accurate imaging of breast tissue than a traditional x-ray.

Space Telescope Technolgy Looks For Cancer.

A look at the top NASA technological innovations that are bettering life on Earth.

mars