Mapping Quantum Entanglement to Axiom

Axiom

🧩 Continuity of the effect is the work of a function that consistently causes one or more effects in a sequence of events, so that if there is no continuity of effect from a function, then the function is a possibility.

The fundamental question regarding the issue of "is there a speed beyond the speed of light?" is ...

Technically speaking, "is there any speed which proceeds without any resistance and greater than the speed of light which is assumed to also proceed unimpeded "

So basically... , how m...

1. But the facts as a result of research showed that what Einstein thought impossible turned out to be not impossible. Is that proof of violating the laws of physics? Which means that the laws of nature are indeterminate?
2. Or even if it i...

Axiom

🧩 A continuity of effects emphasizes changes that show the speed at which the work of a function is completed, so that the more/less the continuity of the effects, the slower/faster the completion of the work of a function.

Axiom

🧩 Quantum entanglement emphasizes minimal changes between two things in one tap, so that there is no continuity of effects that can be perceived as propagation, but there is only continuity of causes that maintains the consistency of the quantum entanglement function itself

...

Axiom

🧩 Quantum entanglement emphasizes minimal changes between two things in one tap, so that there is no continuity of effects that can be perceived as propagation, but there is only continuity of causes that maintains the consistency of the quantum entanglement function itself

Then why do the two sides insist that they are the most correct ❓Where is the misunderstanding between the two sides ❓ Or it's not a misunderstanding but a failure to understand in between both ❓

That's because each of them saw it from the point of view of a non-quantum dimension. They were not used to understanding the quantum world, and their reasoning uses classical reasoning, not quantum reasoning, not quantum logic, yet

They tho...

The true was that quantum entanglement does not involve propagation, so it was true as Einstein said, "nothing is faster than the speed of light". It's just that this statement hadn''t been converted to quantum logic format

If this statement...

Classical Reasoning "nothing is faster than the speed of light"

Quantum Reasoning "nothing is faster than the speed that propagates without resistance, unless the speed occurs without the process of propagation"

Quantum Reasoning (Detailed): The speed in one tap, simultaneous changing one to another involves at least two things, then the two things were connected to each other, so there was no change or communication through propagation

From this, i...

It is possible that scientists now aware of the discovery of quantum entanglement, still stuck to the old reasoning, that "it has been proven that two things are separated at great distances and can communicate almost instantly". Even though the correct format of the quan...

The key is thinking that quantum entanglement as instant communication over such great distances apart (separated one to another), then this is wrong. Because quantum entanglement does not emphasize separation but the continuity of communication (without pause) between tw...

If quantum entanglement is considered to be the existence of separation between two things that are located at different locations that are far from each other, it can certainly seem to contradict Einstein's statement, even though, axiomatically it is a misunderstanding.

Because through reasoning, of course we can realize the logical consequences. it's just that the logical consequence, even though it is undeniably valid, is unsatisfactory if it can't be verified by the senses (out of control) this is where they get confused. 

Axiom

🧩 The continuity of the cause is the resistance of the function in maintaining its consistency as a function, so that if there is no continuity of effect, then the function exist as long as the continuity of the cause

Whereas? It is precisely it happened as Einstein emphasized, that as long as the effect of change between two things there was separation then of course it must be through propagation, and if there was a fact that quantum entanglement then it must not violate the principle of propagation. But the...

Because they were trapped by classical reasoning, and confused because couldn't map events at the level of quantum to their old reasoning, but the facts were proven, then the impression arosed ... "this was a miracle of the universe", "destroys the world of reasoning" ......

They were unable to make adjustments, which ... if they want to expand their point of view, it will be proven not to violate known principles of reasoning, but actually expand reasoning, and .. . , while still being able to feel the wonders of scientific discoveries, with...

From God's point of view it is clear. God's will surely faster than the speed of light.

Then, the problem. how to look at this issue from an axiomatic point of view (absolutely) which certainly does not contradict scientifically at any time ...

So what does this have to do with Einstein's phrase "God doesn't play dice"?

Einstein thought that if there was a speed exceeding the speed of light, it would be impossible. If the impossibility turns out to be not impossible, then according...

This needs to be emphasized because this (for those who are critical) can be a problem. Atheists or other short minded people can twist this for the sake of the absurd (intentionally absurd)

It is possible that developments regarding this issue can be twisted as "the existence of God" or ev...

Einstein argued, nothing will faster than the speed of light in vacuum space (empty air).

This makes sense, because when something travels through space unimpeded, it means that something is capable of reaching top speed, since there is no (...