The view that some person S1 is justified in believing some S2’s testimony that p, if and only if, (a) S1 receives S2’s testimony that p, (b) S1 has inductive evidence based on observation that S2’s testimony that p is reliable, and (c) p is not defeated by other evidence S1 has.
6
4 reads
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about philosophy with this collection
The historical significance of urban centers
The impact of cultural and technological advances
The role of urban centers in shaping society
Related collections
Similar ideas to reductionism (testimonial)
It is a great theory to call out the inconsistencies of others, but it has been criticized for allowing circular reasoning.
The problem is that coherentism has been criticized on these very internalist grounds. If we can be justified in believing things based on no other au...
Some of our most despondent moods are caused by failures of the imagination. Imagination here is the power to envision alternatives. When we're sad, we can't imagine finding other work. We can't imagine getting by in a wheelchair. We can't imagine having to make a new set of ...
While using the P/E ratio as a building block is probably the most popular method to value stocks it is far from the only way. Another common technique to valuing stocks is the price/sales ratio. The P/S ratio is determined by dividing a company's market cap -- the total value of all the companie...
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates