Bushido refers not only to martial rectitude, but to personal rectitude:

‘Rectitude is one’s power to decide upon a course of conduct in accordance with reason, without wavering; to die when to die is right, to strike when to strike is right.’

Bushido distinguishes between bravery and courage:

Courage is worthy of being counted among virtues only if it’s exercised in the cause of Righteousness and Rectitude. In short, ‘Courage is doing what is right.’

A man invested with the power to command, and the power to kill, was expected to demonstrate equally extraordinary powers of benevolence and mercy:

Love, magnanimity, affection for others, sympathy and pity, are traits of Benevolence, the highest attribute of the human soul.

Courtesy is rooted in benevolence:

Courtesy and good manners have been noticed by every foreign tourist as distinctive Japanese traits. But Politeness should be the expression of a benevolent regard for the feelings of others; it’s a poor virtue if it’s motivated only by a fear of offending good taste. In its highest form Politeness approaches love.

True samurai, according to author Nitobe, disdained money, believing that “men must grudge money, for riches hinder wisdom.

Bushido encouraged thrift, not for economical reasons so much as for the exercise of abstinence. Luxury was thought to be one of the greatest downfalls, and severe simplicity was required of the warrior class

Though Bushido deals with the profession of soldiering, it is equally concerned with non-martial behavior:

The sense of Honor, a vivid consciousness of personal dignity and worth, characterized the samurai. He was born and bred to value the duties and privileges of his profession.

One should remain loyal to those to whom they are indebted:

Loyalty to a superior was the most distinctive virtue of the feudal era. Personal fidelity exists among all sorts of people, but only in the code of chivalrous Honor does Loyalty assume paramount importance.

Bushido teaches that one should behave according to an absolute moral standard, one that transcends logic. What’s right is right, and what’s wrong is wrong. The difference between good and bad and between right and wrong are givens, not arguments subject to discussion or justification, and one should know the difference