It’s like defining something. A definition is never complete, just contextual.

When we define something, it must involve all the possibilities that exist.

Example: what is philosophy? Love of wisdom? Contextual...

So, the future of artificial intelligence?

No longer needed: RNN, Transformer, Bayesian, Aristotle Logic System, Sequent Logic, and so forth.

However, artificial intelligence relies entirely on axiom data as mu...

Remember, formula is just narrowing our point of view. So to liberate our point of view, by rejecting all formulas and accept quanta truth of all possibles that exist

Just one, CONTINUOUSLY SUPPLYING AXIOMS,

INJECTING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WITH AXIOMATIC TRUTH.

Then does that mean we never thinking at all? Yes.

So the best we can do? By not think...

That means, philosophy is:

• loving wisdom,
• doesn’t mean eating lunch,
• doesn’t mean singing children’s songs,
• doesn’t mean chewing gum,

Simply Put, It's Axiom

Similarly when someone claims that his reasoning system is complete? It can’t be?

That any reasoning formula that has been successfully programmed into a computer to be able to simulate artificial intelligence to match humans? Again, it can’...

Have you ever heard the true meaning of Data Singularity? Don’t look to the other sides, just look at here.