The so-called post-truth era has revealed vigorous disagreement over the truth of claims of fact — even for claims that are easy to verify.
That disagreement has alarmed our society. After all, it’s often assumed that the labels ‘true’ and ‘false’ should correspond to the objective accuracy of a claim.
But is objective accuracy actually the only criterion we consider when deciding what should qualify as true or false? Or, even when we know how objectively accurate a given claim of fact is, might we be sensitive to features of the social context—such as the intentions of the information source?
29
387 reads
CURATED FROM
Intentions Matter: How Source Intent Influences Perceptions of Truth
neurosciencenews.com
6 ideas
·1.68K reads
IDEAS CURATED BY
Our perception of a source’s intention, whether informative or deceptive, influences our judgment about the truthfulness of a claim. This influence persists even when we have clear knowledge of the factual accuracy of a claim.
“
Similar ideas to The Post-Truth Era
3. For Plato, the idea that there is only one thing and the idea that there are many things that cannot mix are both false, so only discontinuism is true (252d-e): “Therefore, certainly only the third alternative remains. […] Indeed, only one of these three options would be the n...
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates