Five New Thinking Styles for Working With Thinking Machines
Curated from: every.to
Ideas, facts & insights covering these topics:
14 ideas
·3.96K reads
16
4
Explore the World's Best Ideas
Join today and uncover 100+ curated journeys from 50+ topics. Unlock access to our mobile app with extensive features.
Rethinking How We Think in the AI Era
- The rise of AI is quietly rewriting the rulebook on human problem-solving.
- For centuries, Western thinking has idolized rationalism and science, the engines behind modern marvels like rockets, vaccines, and smartphones.
- Our mental playbook—hypotheses, theories, and frameworks—has mirrored this success, producing tools like Porter’s five forces and Christensen’s jobs-to-be-done framework.
- But AI demands a new mindset.
- As we transition from Software 1.0 (human-written instructions) to Software 2.0 (goal-driven training models), traditional rationalist approaches may no longer suffice.
47
567 reads
41
535 reads
- Instead of designing step-by-step solutions, engineers now train AI systems by exploring infinite possibilities until one works. This isn’t about finding universal truths; it’s about achieving specific outcomes.
- This paradigm shift—from theorizing to engineering—could fundamentally reshape how we approach problems, pushing us to embrace more flexible, results-oriented thinking styles.
45
415 reads
1. Essences vs. sequences
- In a pre-AI world, success depended on isolating and mastering the essence of a problem—defining clear, static rules to address challenges.
- Software required pinpointing the core user and their problem; marketing plans relied on fixed theses and strategies.
- This reductionist approach assumed that breaking problems into their simplest elements would yield the best solutions.
42
360 reads
- In a post-AI world, however, essence gives way to sequence. The focus shifts from identifying universal truths to analyzing patterns of behavior or chains of events.
- For example, a SaaS business once relied on rigid rules to predict churn—like tracking login frequency or payment data.
- Now, AI models examine vast sequences of user behavior, uncovering nuanced patterns no human could predict or explicitly define.
42
319 reads
- This shift is profound: AI doesn't "understand" the problem as humans would but detects intricate correlations across millions of variables.
- By feeding historical data into machine learning models, businesses can predict outcomes with staggering precision, bypassing traditional rule-setting altogether.
- The surprising implication? AI redefines problem-solving as probabilistic rather than deterministic.
- Instead of designing solutions around abstractions, we now let machines find actionable insights buried in complexity—a radically different approach to understanding and shaping the world.
47
288 reads
2. Rules vs. patterns
- In a post-AI world, the focus shifts from crafting explicit rules to identifying patterns through examples—a transformation that challenges traditional problem-solving.
- Rather than painstakingly coding systems or defining principles, AI enables us to translate abstract preferences and complex behaviors into actionable frameworks.
- For instance, instead of dictating how software should function, you can provide a collection of UI inspirations, and AI will discern the underlying patterns to build it.
43
245 reads
- Similarly, in creative work, AI can replicate brand voice and style by analyzing curated examples, bypassing the need for rigid systems.
- This approach turns "taste" into a teachable input, empowering teams to scale and adapt their output fluidly.
- The surprising twist is that clarity now hinges on high-quality examples, not logical frameworks—shifting the emphasis from explaining to showing.
- This pattern-first mindset reframes intellectual and creative work, pushing us to think less about rules and more about resonance.
42
209 reads
3. Process vs. intuition
- Traditionally, software required reducing tasks to explicit rules—a framework that worked well for structured systems like customer relationship management.
- However, many complex tasks, like optical character recognition (OCR), resist such reduction. Deep learning now enables software to develop "intuition," effectively handling tasks once deemed unprogrammable.
- This breakthrough extends beyond OCR into realms thought untouchable by software, like evaluating startup pitches or diagnosing medical conditions.
43
207 reads
- These tasks rely on nuanced, ineffable judgments that AI can now replicate and transfer.
- In a post-AI world, intuition becomes not just accessible but deployable, breaking free from human exclusivity and revolutionizing fields reliant on tacit expertise.
- This shift challenges the traditional belief that only processes can be mechanized, opening doors to new, intuitive possibilities for technology and human collaboration.
41
180 reads
4. Sculpting vs. gardening
- Previously, creativity demanded precision and control, akin to sculpting—a process where every detail was manually crafted, with each step entirely reliant on the creator’s intent.
- Coding, for instance, required meticulous shaping of logic and structure, piece by piece.
- Now, AI tools like Cursor reframe the process as gardening. Instead of chiseling ideas into existence, creators establish conditions for ideas to flourish.
- Prompting AI models replaces manual labor, transforming the act of creation into one of guidance and curation.
43
175 reads
- The focus shifts from direct intervention to fostering an environment where growth can happen organically.
- This evolution challenges traditional notions of authorship, emphasizing collaboration over singular ownership.
- As the creative process becomes more intuitive and adaptive, the role of the creator morphs into one of partnership with intelligent tools—an unpredictable and deeply collaborative journey.
42
159 reads
5. Explanations vs. predictions
- Western thought fixates on explanations, seeking rules to control and demystify success, whether in individuals like Mark Zuckerberg or in scientific phenomena.
- Yet explanations often fail to capture reality's complexity. Zuckerberg’s success, for instance, stems less from explicit principles and more from intuitive decision-making he likely can’t fully articulate.
- The post-AI era flips this dynamic. Predictions, not explanations, are becoming paramount.
- AI models, trained on vast data, encapsulate intuition without needing human comprehension of underlying processes.
42
150 reads
- This transition is reshaping science: the 2024 Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry went to computer scientists optimizing predictive architectures—not traditional theorists crafting better explanations.
- This shift transforms science into engineering, emphasizing creation over understanding.
- The question is no longer "What is this?" but "How can I predict this?"
- This pivot could redefine progress, transcending Enlightenment rationalism and opening new paradigms for navigating complexity and understanding ourselves.
43
151 reads
IDEAS CURATED BY
Content Curator | Absurdist | Amateur Gamer | Failed musician | Successful pessimist | Pianist |
CURATOR'S NOTE
A world with thinking machines requires new thinking styles.
“
Similar ideas
8 ideas
Five critical questions to explain Explainable AI
towardsdatascience.com
5 ideas
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates