*Pic depicts mass hindu genocide done by Taimur*
He is portrayed as a blood thirsty monster which he wasn't. The fact that historians tend to glorify genocidal barbarics like Taimur, Aurangazeb, Iltutmish and Jalaluddin who were definitely more blood thirsty and monstrous signifies the tampering of history according to convenience.
Also Genghis Khan was definitely less of a monster than stalin and mao. That's for sure.
So, are they historians or religious conservatives take your pick?
24
243 reads
CURATED FROM
IDEAS CURATED BY
Cybersecurity Engineer specializes in VAPT and Network Security. Passionate about data security, and sharing insights through my cybersecurity blog.
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about history with this collection
How to secure funding
How to market and sell your product or service
How to scale and grow your business
Related collections
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates