Carbon taxes are government fees imposed on carbon-emitting firms and businesses for each ton of greenhouse gases they emit.
According to Parry (2019), countries will greatly benefit from carbon taxation in reducing greenhouse gases; however, what Parry fails to cover in his study is how this would affect the economies of the developing countries.
MORE IDEAS FROM THEARTICLE
Mitigation of climate change is a global responsibility that all nations take part in.
Being in an era where industrialization and modernization exacerbate the condition of our environment, among the measures that policymakers proposed to ease the impact of this environmental phenomenon is to impose a Pigouvian tax on firms and industries for each ton of greenhouse gases that they emit through a taxation policy called carbon taxation.
A solution may be proposed to the burden, which is to allocate the taxes collected from carbon pricing in subsidizing the needs of agricultural workers; however, will these subsidies be enough to cover agricultural emergencies such as, for instance, flooding? Furthermore, developing countries are challenged by high energy tariffs which are no longer within the scope of carbon taxation.
The premise of carbon taxation does wonders in reducing GHGs; but there are countries that are yet to prepare for its consequences on the livelihood of its citizens.
It is not fair that developing countries would also be imposed with carbon taxes without further research on its economic and social implications, including how our the agricultural and transportation services sectors, being two of the largest sources of the livelihood of their citizens, would benefit from this policy.
For instance, in the Philippines, carbon taxation will increase the accumulated transaction costs suppliers will shoulder, including the costs incurred by transportation, machinery, and consumption of fertilizers; thus, increasing the prices of our agricultural products.
A carbon footprint is the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions that come from the production, use, and end-of-life of a product or service. It includes carbon dioxide — the gas most commonly emitted by humans.
Usually, the bulk of an individual’s carbon footprint will come from transportation, housing and food.
There are simple choices you can make in your day-to-day life to lessen your personal impact on the environment.
Supposing as true the fact that "mankind is superior to all the other animals" we have major responsabilities on our shoulders.
Let me make an example:
Plastic by itself is really an extraordinary item , the problem with it is HOW do we manage plastic. Infact is recognised that we should avoid plastic waste and we should be more responsible in using it (even switching to non-plastic items).
Now let me ask you, HOW DO WE TREAT ANIMALS? IS THAT RESPONSIBLE AND FAIR?
According to the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance (CCAF), Bitcoin currently consumes around 110 Terawatt Hours per year 0.55% of global electricity production, or roughly equivalent to the annual energy draw of small countries like Malaysia or Sweden.
❤️ Brainstash Inc.