The first step in most programming languages is lexing, or tokenizing. ‘Lex’ is short for lexical analysis, a very fancy word for splitting a bunch of text into tokens. The word ‘tokenizer’ makes a lot more sense, but ‘lexer’ is so much fun to say that I use it anyway.

Lexing

Put simply, the action tree is the AST with context. That context is info such as what type a function returns, or that two places in which a variable is used are in fact using the same variable. Because it needs to figure out and remember all this context, the code that generates the action tree needs lots of namespace lookup tables and other thingamabobs.

Action Tree vs AST

The parser adds structure to to the ordered list of tokens the lexer produces. To stop ambiguities, the parser must take into account parenthesis and the order of operations. Simply parsing operators isn’t terribly difficult, but as more language constructs get added, parsing can become very complex.

Parser Duties

Once we have the action tree, running the code is easy. Each action node has a function ‘execute’ which takes some input, does whatever the action should (including possibly calling sub action) and returns the action’s output. This is the interpreter in action.

Running the Action Tree

A token is a small unit of a language. A token might be a variable or function name (AKA an identifier), an operator or a number.

Tokens

The parser turns a list of tokens into a tree of nodes. A tree used for storing this type of data is known as an Abstract Syntax Tree, or AST. At least in Pinecone, the AST does not have any info about types or which identifiers are which. It is simply structured tokens.

Parsing

<ul><li>Minimize context switching in workflow: context switching between C++ and Pinecone is bad enough without throwing in Bison’s grammar grammar </li><li>Every time grammar changes bison has to be run before the build.</li><li>A custom Parser is completely doable.</li></ul>

Why Custom Is Better

If you are writing an interpreted language, it makes a lot of sense to write it in a compiled one (like C, C++ or swift). If you plan to compile, a slower language (like python or Javascript) is more acceptable.

Choosing a Language

A programming language is generally structured as a pipeline. That is, it has several stages. Each stage has data formatted in a specific, well defined way. It also has functions to transform data from each stage to the next.

High Level Design

The predominant parsing library is Bison. Bison works a lot like Flex. You write a file in a custom format that stores the grammar information, then Bison uses that to generate a C program that will do your parsing. I did not choose to use Bison.

Bison

There are two major types of languages: compiled and interpreted: <ul><li>A compiler figures out everything a program will do, turns it into “machine code”, then saves that to be executed later. </li><li>An interpreter steps through the source code line by line, figuring out what it’s doing as it goes.  </li></ul>

Compiled vs Interpreted

Over the past 6 months, I’ve been working on a programming language called Pinecone. I wouldn’t call it mature yet, but it already has enough features working to be usable, such as: I’m not an…

Choosing a Language

Similar ideas to Choosing a Language

JavaScript

Writing as a tool

Methods for learning a language