That is why the enlightened people, they are confused in facing situations that are different from the everyday dimension. There were gaps but those were facts. Their mind demanded an explanation for themselves.

Then they searched for parables for themselves. Sadly ... They were also trappe...

An example is even simpler, very familiar in everyday life ... "don't hurt if you don't want to be hurt. You hurt, definitely you'll get it back, right? This can be denied ... "if my friend is hurt he doesn't fight back, such patience"

Now here we need to understand the function of the para...

Now back to the problem of parables. The function of parable ...

• - To show that something is possible, it's that simple
• - Later, over time, with the axiom, the parable will frozen

Suddenly hard stiffness cannot be turned from a different direction.

Then how to harden the parable so that even though it is flexible it remains strong. So that we ourselves are not trapped by the rubber game in logic?

Here an axiom is required to be accompanied by a parable. As thought goes on, we will see the right angle to the parable which is in harmon...

Every illustration is refutable. Why? Because it's just an illustration.

They thought they were philosophizing, but it's just twisting parable, stretching it, modifying it. They're not philosophizing, they were playing Lego .