Reflect Your Own Thoughts

Instead of saying: "The main character's dialogue was good, but the side characters all sound the same." or "The main character's dialogue was good, but the side characters all sound the same. But you did a really great job on the main character's voice!"

Try: "The main character's dialogue was great. However, it's important to make sure that the side characters have just as distinctive of a voice."

Characters

• Did the characters act realistically in the situations that they were in?
• Did they have distinct personalities and/or voices?
• Was the POV for the story consistent?
• How well-written was the dialogue?
• Can you sympathize and/or empathize with the characters?
• Are the characters layered & complex?

Overall

• What is your overall impression of the story?
• What is the strongest part of the story? The weakest?
• What's one line that you loved?
• Did you cover the specific points that the writer asked for critique on?

• Unless the author has specifically asked for it, don't get hung up over word choice or line edits.
• Sticking to the bigger picture is the best choice.

If you must make comments on their word choice, instead of pulling every single faulty error out, select a few examples and make a general comment, such as:

"The body language in this piece tends to be expressed by lots of basic facial expressions, like frowns, smiles, scowls. I think it would be better if there was some variety, such as replacing an occasional smile with "lips curved upwards" or scowls with "clenched jaws", and so on, so forth."

Instead of saying: "You lack creativity."

Try: "The plot about the character's parents being dead is an overused trope." (and then, of course, adding ways that this person can change that, such as, "How about changing it so that their parents aren't dead, just distant to the character?" so that it is constructive!)

Instead of saying: "You make a lot of grammar mistakes."

Try: "This excerpt has lots of grammar mistakes."

Instead of saying: "This is confusing."

Try: "I don't understand how your character got from Point A to Point B. It will probably be better if you elaborate on how they got there in the story, so it's clearer for your readers."

Explain why changes need to be made, why lines need to be cut out, why parts are confusing.

On the other hand, critiques are not for blind flattery as well. Some may approach a critique channel with a desire to just receive pointless flattery. However, the majority are here to improve.

Language

• Was the piece easy to read and/or understandable?
• How was the flow of the writing style overall?
• Were the sentences too long or short?
• Were words used correctly?
• Were some words, punctuation, and/or syntax patterns overused?
• Were there any grammar mistakes/mistake patterns?
• How was the description (too long, non-existent, repetitive)?
• Were tenses consistent?

Plot

• Was there a plot?
• Any plot holes?
• Were the sequence of events natural?
• Was there anything that confused you in regards to plot. How were they confusing?
• Did the story drag or move too fast?
• Did the story interest and/or hook you?

When critiquing a peer's work:

1. Understand That Critiques are for Improvement
2. Start With Something Good & Relate It
3. Remove Personal Remarks
4. Reflect Your Own Thoughts
5. Don't Critique Something you Dislike
6. Avoid Critiques of Word Choice
7. Have some General Questions to Think About

Every critique is an opinion, but it's also important to make your critiques objective, when it comes to letting your personal enjoyment of a genre, or liking of the writer themselves, factor into your criticism. Furthermore, it's also nice to enjoy the critique process as well. It's difficult to find fun in critiquing something you absolutely abhor reading.