deepstash
Beta
Risk: Seeing around the corners
Risk along the value chain
Most companies only examine the most direct risks facing a company and tend to neglect secondary risks that can have an even greater impact.
Companies need to learn to evaluate aftereffects that could weaken whole value chains.
48 SAVES
This is a professional note extracted from an online article.
Read more efficiently
Save what inspires you
Remember anything
IDEA EXTRACTED FROM:
7
Key Ideas
Considering risk
But those who routinely examine the way risks propagate across the entire value chain are better prepared for second-order effects.
Competitors
All differences in business models can create the potential for competitive risk exposure. This does not mean that a company should imitate its competitors, but that it should consider the risk when they have different strategies.
Supply chains
Risk analysis focuses all too often only on direct threats. The classic domino effects linked to supply chains include
- disruptions in the availability of parts or raw materials
- changes in the cost structures of suppliers
- shifts in logistics costs
Distribution channels
Indirect risks can also hide in distribution channels. It may include the inability to reach the end customers, new distribution costs or redefined business models.
Customer response
The most complex domino effect is the responses from customers.
The shift in buying patterns can create a typical cascading effect. Another is changed demand levels.
Effects on a company’s risk profile
Considering the impact of a risk on a company and how it propagates through the valued chain can help management think through the change. For example, the risk posed by carbon regulation on the aluminum industry.
SIMILAR ARTICLES & IDEAS:
10
Key Ideas
How leaders cope with uncertainty
Uncertainty is always there. The degree of uncertainty can rise and fall.
Leaders, being human, also have difficulty coping with uncertainty. When they receive confusing information, they te...
Heuristics during periods of uncertainty
During periods of heightened uncertainty, leaders reflexively reduce investment, stop hiring, slash marketing, refrain from entering new markets, or stop making decisions.
Although understandable, acting in a pro-cyclical manner can be counterproductive. It can leave companies poorly positioned to benefit from the next stage of the cycle.
Attributes to succeed in uncertainty
Organizations should be inclined toward action. As a baseline, companies must strive to be fit for growth. This can be done by aligning costs with priorities and strategy, investing in varied capabilities, and using traditional and digital levers to execute.
They must regularly engage in scenario planning with an array of options. They must build the capacity to be agile. They must learn to become more resilient to withstand strong external forces and quickly recover from setbacks.
7 more ideas
9
Key Ideas
The model of future work
By 2030, up to 30 to 40 percent of all workers in developed countries may need to move into new occupations or upgrade their skill sets. Skilled workers in short supply will become even scar...
Employers should lead the way
The pace and scale that technology disrupts is a social, political and business challenge.
Employers are best placed to make a positive societal impact, for example, by upgrading the abilities of their employees and equipping them with new skills. Employers will also reap the greatest benefit if they can successfully transform the workforce in this way.
Talent is the largest barrier
Talent is the largest barrier to the successful implementation of new strategies.
Many leading businesses realize that it is quicker and more financially prudent to look internally and develop the talent they already have. Yet only a third of global executives report that their organizations have launched any new reskilling programs.
6 more ideas
/media/img/mt/2020/04/The_Atlantic_033120_Final_2000x1125px_1/original.png)
5
Key Ideas
A new playbook
Growth evangelists are right when they state that severe lockdowns produce a parallel human misery of unemployment, looming bankruptcies, and extreme financial anguish. Yet, opening the economy too...
The false choice
“Save the economy or save lives” is a false choice.
A group of economists published a paper on the 1918 flu outbreak. Their findings revealed:
- Early and aggressive interventions saved lives and triggered a faster rebound, such as job growth and banking assets.
- Without a healthy population, there can be no healthy economy.
The hope is for a deep, short recession, to show that people have shut the economy down to limit the spread of disease.
A living wage
Asking millions of able-bodied workers to stop working creates a crisis of unemployment.
During this time, the U.S. is expanding unemployment benefits and are also delaying tax filing. In northern-European countries, the government is directly paying businesses to maintain their payrolls to avoid mass layoffs and furloughs.
2 more ideas