The Benefit Of Having Ideas Challenged - Deepstash
What Is Opportunity Cost

Learn more about problemsolving with this collection

The impact of opportunity cost on personal and professional life

Evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of different choices

Understanding the concept of opportunity cost

What Is Opportunity Cost

Discover 93 similar ideas in

It takes just

13 mins to read

The Benefit Of Having Ideas Challenged

The Benefit Of Having Ideas Challenged

The aim of reasoning in philosophy is not to defend a particular piece of intellectual territory, but to get closer to the truth. Having one's commitments and assumptions pointed out and noting how they influence one's way of thinking is an important step towards this.

10

36 reads

MORE IDEAS ON THIS

Too Much For The 17th Century

Too Much For The 17th Century

  • Margaret Cavendish was writing at a time when the prevailing view was that only men were cut out for a life of reflection, while women were better suited to more menial affairs.
  • Although she was aware of the social restraints on her philosophical endeavours, Cavendish took matters in...

10

83 reads

Addressing Her Work To Herself

Addressing Her Work To Herself

When Cavendish’s Philosophical Letters (1664) were published, epistolary writings, in which prominent figures debated the most significant philosophical issues of the day, were common. In her own Letters, Cavendish critically responds to the wor...

9

30 reads

The Reasoning Process

When we are thinking through an issue, the reasoning process often takes the form of a back-and-forth. Objections, concerns, and problems arise as we try to work through a point. Sometimes, this can make it feel like there is someone there, inside your head, actually responding to you.

9

44 reads

MARGARET CAVENDISH

By Discourse, I do not mean speech, but an Arguing of the mind … for Discourse is as much as Reasoning with ourselves.

MARGARET CAVENDISH

10

72 reads

Two Minds Debating

Two Minds Debating

Cavendish presents herself as literally in two minds. The two ‘parts’ of Cavendish’s mind cannot come to an agreement (perhaps reflecting the fact that reasoning can sometimes lead to an impasse). She thus asks her readers to play the role of an impartial judge and ‘if possible, to reduc...

9

25 reads

A Third Person To Scrutinize

A Third Person To Scrutinize

This sense of thinking through an issue as a back-and-forth is something that philosophy teachers (myself included) often try to encourage in students. They should read their work and imagine someone (perhaps annoyingly child-like) asking Why? at every possible juncture. What’s the evide...

10

56 reads

CURATED FROM

IDEAS CURATED BY

mamadoo

“You have to remember something: Everybody pities

Debating your own ideas.

Read & Learn

20x Faster

without
deepstash

with
deepstash

with

deepstash

Personalized microlearning

100+ Learning Journeys

Access to 200,000+ ideas

Access to the mobile app

Unlimited idea saving

Unlimited history

Unlimited listening to ideas

Downloading & offline access

Supercharge your mind with one idea per day

Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.

Email

I agree to receive email updates