Arguments within a Gish gallop

• Full rebuttal. Go over every point made by your opponent, and refute each of them individually.
• Sample-based rebuttal. Select a representative sample of your opponent's arguments, either randomly or based on some criteria, then refute only those a...

This technique's strength is that it frames the course of the debate and can create a false appearance of credibility and control.

• Because it gives an advantage to the Gish galloper, your best course of action is to avoid playing their game.

• In live debates, a person using the Gish gallop will fire off arguments one after another to attempt to overwhelm the opponent.
• In online discussions, Gish gallopers will list a large number of sources that supposedly support their stance. They wil...

The Gish gallop technique is used for two main reasons:

1. It is often easier to raise weak arguments than it is to refute them.
2. People generally prefer simple arguments and not complex refutations. The Gish gallop often contains these arg...

A classic example is when a proponent of some pseudoscience bombards an expert with many weak arguments and start a new argument each time the expert successfully refute one of them.

But Gish gallops also appear in less formal contexts. E.g., someone who w...

It is a rhetorical technique that involves overwhelming your opponent with numerous vague arguments, with no regard for accuracy, validity, or relevance of those arguments.

The Gish gallop is a misleading rhetorical technique, rather than a logical fallacy...

The Gish gallop technique was first known by names such as 'argument by verbosity', 'proof by verbosity', and 'shotgun argumentation.'

Professor Eugenie Scott used the term 'Gish gallop' to describe the debate technique of Duane Gish, a Yo...

Arguments in a Gish gallop often contain various logical fallacies, such as the strawman fallacy which attacks a fabricated argument, or appeals to nature, which claims something is good because it is perceived as natural.