Peer review isn't perfect - Deepstash

Peer review isn't perfect

In a peer review system, independent, anonymous experts read over a paper submitted to a journal. They can recommend revisions to the text, new experiments that should be added, or even that the journal shouldn't publish the paper.

But reviewers aren't asked to ensure that the results are absolutely correct. It would be too time-consuming and impractical. That means that a peer review is mostly beneficial, but not perfect.

81

182 reads

CURATED FROM

IDEAS CURATED BY

colinii

A lot of problems would disappear if we talked to each other more than talking about each other.

The idea is part of this collection:

How To Break Bad Habits

Learn more about problemsolving with this collection

Understanding the psychological rewards of bad habits

Creating new habits to replace old ones

Developing self-discipline

Related collections

Read & Learn

20x Faster

without
deepstash

with
deepstash

with

deepstash

Personalized microlearning

100+ Learning Journeys

Access to 200,000+ ideas

Access to the mobile app

Unlimited idea saving

Unlimited history

Unlimited listening to ideas

Downloading & offline access

Supercharge your mind with one idea per day

Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.

Email

I agree to receive email updates