“A basic or citizen’s income is not an alternative to a negative income tax. It is simply another way to introduce a negative income tax if it is accompanied with a positive income tax with no exemption. A basic income of a thousand units with a 20 percent rate on earned income is equivalent to a negative income tax with an exemption of five thousand units and a 20 percent rate below and above five thousand units.” — Milton Friedman, 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences

Basic or citizen's income

<figure><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/0*x0O3TbBIqstn" width="680" height="453"><figcaption dir="auto">Image source: Taxcredits.net</figcaption></figure>Imagine a group of 5 people. They have an income distribution of $10, $20, $30, $50, and $100. Someone gets <a rel="noopener follow" href="https://medium.com/basic-income/inequality-and-the-basic-income-guarantee-c8f84d936640" dir="ltr">the BIG idea</a> of everyone putting <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/does-basic-income-reduce-income-inequality-gini" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">40% of their money into a hat</a>, and dividing the result equitably between everyone.That means $4, $8, $12, $20, and $40 goes into the hat. That’s $84 which when divided by 5 is $16.80.Another way of looking at this result is that the amounts paid were -$12.80, -$8.80, -$4.80, $3.20, and $23.20. The poorest three people paid negative amounts (negative taxation), meaning they received money, and the richest two people paid positive amounts (positive taxation), meaning they lost money.If we add up the negative amounts and the positive amounts, we see that the poorest three received a total of $26.40, and the richest two lost that same amount. That is the amount of money that physically changed hands, even though everyone put money into the hat, and everyone got money from the hat.Okay, so here’s the question: How much did it cost to make sure everyone received $16.80? Was it $16.80 multiplied by 5, so $84? Or was it $26.40?The answer is $26.40, which is 31.4% of $84. The true cost is less than one-third the false cost!This math problem is what’s needed to understand the cost of basic income. Every time someone multiplies the number of people receiving basic income by the amount of basic income, they are saying the correct answer to the above math problem is $84, and that is entirely incorrect. They’re calculating the false cost. Such a mistake can also lead to assumptions of everything costing more, which are just as mistaken. <a rel="noopener follow" href="https://medium.com/basic-income/wouldnt-unconditional-basic-income-just-cause-massive-inflation-fe71d69f15e7" dir="ltr">Inflation is a bogeyman</a>.Here’s another math problem. What is the cost to provide you $12,000 in basic income if you are asked to pay $12,000 to receive it?The answer is $0. It carries no cost. If 1,000 people fit the exact same example, the cost is 1,000 x 0, and that’s still zero. Multiplying 1 million by 0 is still 0. That’s how zero works.The true cost of basic income is thus the amount of money provided to net receivers, not net payers (who all cost nothing), minus the amount net receivers put into the hat.I calculate this as <a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/why-we-should-all-have-a-basic-income" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">around $900 billion in the U.S.</a> (based on $12,000 per adult citizen and $4,000 per child) , and this is true for both a <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/negative-income-tax-nit-and-unconditional-basic-income-ubi-what-makes-them-the-same-and-what-makes-them-different" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">negative income tax</a> (with a 40% clawback rate) and a universal basic income (<a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/does-basic-income-reduce-income-inequality-gini" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">with a 40% flat tax</a>).<figure><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/0*l8lfakXyxtU6zAgC." width="680" height="493"></figure><figure><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/0*bwhJJz-fSYQlph-Z." width="680" height="507"></figure><BLOCKQUOTE>“A basic or citizen’s income is not an alternative to a negative income tax. It is simply another way to introduce a negative income tax if it is accompanied with a positive income tax with no exemption. A basic income of a thousand units with a 20 percent rate on earned income is equivalent to a negative income tax with an exemption of five thousand units and a 20 percent rate below and above five thousand units.” — Milton Friedman, 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences</BLOCKQUOTE>So does <a href="http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-quick-note-on-univeral-basic-income.html" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Greg Mankiw</a>.<BLOCKQUOTE>“I have seen smart people argue as follows: Policy A is crazy. Why should Bill Gates get a government transfer? He doesn’t need it, and we would need to raise taxes more to pay for it. Policy B is more progressive. It targets the transfer to those who really need it, and the transfer is financed by a smaller tax increase levied only on those with above-average incomes. But here is the rub: The two policies are equivalent. If you look at the net payment (taxes less transfer), everyone is exactly the same under the two plans. The difference is only a matter of framing.” — Greg Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University</BLOCKQUOTE>However, for a cost estimate to be even more accurate, we then need to subtract out all the programs replaced by basic income, and also all the tax credits replaced by basic income. That total is in the hundreds of billions of dollars range depending on the choices we make, certainly not the $3 trillion gross range or even the $900 billion net transfer range.Meanwhile the full costs of people not having basic income, aka the costs of not eliminating poverty…?Isn’t math fun?!With the net cost of basic income now understood, <a rel="noopener follow" href="https://medium.com/economicsecproj/how-to-reform-welfare-and-taxes-to-provide-every-american-citizen-with-a-basic-income-bc67d3f4c2b8" dir="ltr">here’s how I’d fund basic income in the U.S.</a>This post was written thanks to a crowdfunded basic income. You can support it along with all my advocacy for basic income with <a href="http://www.patreon.com/scottsantens" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">a monthly patron pledge</a> of $1+ or a donation to <a href="https://www.gofundme.com/2arwje4" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">my UBI advocacy travel fund</a>.Special thanks to: Steven Grimm, Haroon Mokhtarzada, Floyd Marinescu, Larry Cohen, Andy Stern, Patrick, Dominic Wyler, Kian Alavi, Evelyn Lawig, Joanna Zarach, Ace Bailey, Justin Walsh, Daragh Ward, Natalie Foster, Gisele Huff, Albert Wenger, Victor Vurpillat, Chris Rauchle, BoNster, Richard Just, Rachel Perkins, Che Wagner, Harmony Klohr, Taressa Strong, Jordan Lejuwaan, Carrie Mclachlan, Paul Godsmark, Daniel Brockman, Allan Free, Lainie Petersen, Vladimir Baranov, Gray Scott, David Ihnen, Katie Doemland, Joe Ballou, Mybasicincome.org, Jack Wagner, Gerald Huff, John David Hodge, Michael Honey, Chris McCoy, Jan Smole, Danielle and Michael Texeira, Stephane Boisvert, Chris Smothers, Joel Leoj, Saura Naderi, Kai Wong, Miranda Midgely, Darrell, Nicolas Pouillard, Georg Baumann, Lisa Hallman, UBIGinc.org, Justin Hebert, Stuart Mark, Jill Weiss, Mark Witham, David Bijl, Andreas, Lawrence W Lee, Allen Bauer, Robert F. Greene, Erhan Altay, Robert Solovay, Masud Shah, Elizabeth Balcar, Casey Young, Thomas Welsh, Amy Shaffer, Kris Roadruck, Dave Shelton, Lee Irving, Kirk Israel, Tony DeStefano, Paolo Narciso, Victor Lau, Martin Jordo, Max Henrion, Catherine MacDonald, Arjun Banker, Walter Schaerer, Topher Hunt, Dan O’Sullivan, Louise Whitmore, all my other funders for their support, and my amazing partner, Katie Smith.<h2 data-selectable-paragraph=""><a href="http://www.patreon.com/bePatron?rid=120769&amp;u=296170&amp;patAmt=7.00#/r120769" rel="noopener">Would you like to see your name here too?</a></h2>Scott Santens <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">writes</a> and <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/media-appearances" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">speaks</a> about the idea of unconditional basic income. You can follow him here on <a rel="noopener follow" href="https://medium.com/@2noame" dir="ltr">Medium</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/scottsantens" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/scottsantens" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/scott-santens" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">HuffPo</a>, <a href="https://futurism.com/author/2noame/" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Futurism</a>, <a href="https://steemit.com/@scottsantens" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Steemit</a>, or <a href="http://www.reddit.com/user/2noame/" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">Reddit</a> where he is a moderator for the <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/basicincome/wiki" rel="noopener" dir="ltr">/r/BasicIncome</a> community of over 40,000 subscribers.If you feel others should read this article, please click the heart to share.<figure><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/1*prif7-04oPf8Dqo1gvSDs" width="680" height="67"></figure>

Imagine a group of 5 people. They have an income distribution of $10, $20, $30, $50, and $100. Someone gets the BIG idea of everyone putting 40% of their money into a hat, and dividing the result…

Discover the world of business and economics.

economics

Economics

Imagine a group of 5 people. They have an income distribution of $10, $20, $30, $50, and $100 . Someone gets <a href="https://medium.com/basic-income/inequality-and-the-basic-income-guarantee-c8f84d936640">the BIG idea </a>of everyone putting <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/does-basic-income-reduce-income-inequality-gini">40% of their money into a hat </a>, and dividing the result equitably between everyone.

That means $4, $8, $12, $20, and $40 goes into the hat. That’s $84 which when divided by 5 is $16.80 .

Another way of looking at this result is that the amounts paid were -$12.80, -$8.80, -$4.80, $3.20, and $23.20 . The poorest three people paid negative amounts (negative taxation) , meaning they received money, and the richest two people paid positive amounts (positive taxation) , meaning they lost money.

If we add up the negative amounts and the positive amounts, we see that the poorest three received a total of $26.40 , and the richest two lost that same amount. That is the amount of money that physically changed hands, even though everyone put money into the hat, and everyone got money from the hat.

Okay, so here’s the question: How much did it cost to make sure everyone received $16.80? Was it $16.80 multiplied by 5, so $84? Or was it $26.40?

The answer is $26.40, which is 31.4% of $84. The true cost is less than one-third the false cost!

This math problem is what’s needed to understand the cost of basic income. Every time someone multiplies the number of people receiving basic income by the amount of basic income, they are saying the correct answer to the above math problem is $84, and that is entirely incorrect. They’re calculating the false cost. Such a mistake can also lead to assumptions of everything costing more, which are just as mistaken. <a href="https://medium.com/basic-income/wouldnt-unconditional-basic-income-just-cause-massive-inflation-fe71d69f15e7">Inflation is a bogeyman </a>.

Here’s another math problem. What is the cost to provide you $12,000 in basic income if you are asked to pay $12,000 to receive it?

The answer is $0. It carries no cost . If 1,000 people fit the exact same example, the cost is 1,000 x 0, and that’s still zero. Multiplying 1 million by 0 is still 0. That’s how zero works.

The true cost of basic income is thus the amount of money provided to net receivers, not net payers (who all cost nothing), minus the amount net receivers put into the hat.

I calculate this as <a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/why-we-should-all-have-a-basic-income">around $900 billion in the U.S. </a>(based on $12,000 per adult citizen and $4,000 per child) , and this is true for both a <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/negative-income-tax-nit-and-unconditional-basic-income-ubi-what-makes-them-the-same-and-what-makes-them-different">negative income tax </a>(with a 40% clawback rate) and a universal basic income (<a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/does-basic-income-reduce-income-inequality-gini">with a 40% flat tax </a>).

“ A basic or citizen’s income is not an alternative to a negative income tax. It is simply another way to introduce a negative income tax if it is accompanied with a positive income tax with no exemption. A basic income of a thousand units with a 20 percent rate on earned income is equivalent to a negative income tax with an exemption of five thousand units and a 20 percent rate below and above five thousand units.” — Milton Friedman, 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences

So does <a href="http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-quick-note-on-univeral-basic-income.html">Greg Mankiw </a>.

“I have seen smart people argue as follows: Policy A is crazy. Why should Bill Gates get a government transfer? He doesn’t need it, and we would need to raise taxes more to pay for it. Policy B is more progressive. It targets the transfer to those who really need it, and the transfer is financed by a smaller tax increase levied only on those with above-average incomes. But here is the rub: The two policies are equivalent. If you look at the net payment (taxes less transfer), everyone is exactly the same under the two plans. The difference is only a matter of framing.”— Greg Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University

However, for a cost estimate to be even more accurate, we then need to subtract out all the programs replaced by basic income, and also all the tax credits replaced by basic income. That total is in the hundreds of billions of dollars range depending on the choices we make, certainly not the $3 trillion gross range or even the $900 billion net transfer range.

Meanwhile the full costs of people not having basic income, aka the costs of not eliminating poverty…?

With the net cost of basic income now understood, <a href="https://medium.com/economicsecproj/how-to-reform-welfare-and-taxes-to-provide-every-american-citizen-with-a-basic-income-bc67d3f4c2b8">here’s how I’d fund basic income in the U.S. </a>

This post was written thanks to a crowdfunded basic income. You can support it along with all my advocacy for basic income with <a href="http://www.patreon.com/scottsantens">a monthly patron pledge </a>of $1+ or a donation to <a href="https://www.gofundme.com/2arwje4">my UBI advocacy travel fund </a>.

Special thanks to: Steven Grimm, Haroon Mokhtarzada, Floyd Marinescu, Larry Cohen, Andy Stern, Patrick, Dominic Wyler, Kian Alavi, Evelyn Lawig, Joanna Zarach, Ace Bailey, Justin Walsh, Daragh Ward, Natalie Foster, Gisele Huff, Albert Wenger, Victor Vurpillat, Chris Rauchle, BoNster, Richard Just, Rachel Perkins, Che Wagner, Harmony Klohr, Taressa Strong, Jordan Lejuwaan, Carrie Mclachlan, Paul Godsmark, Daniel Brockman, Allan Free, Lainie Petersen, Vladimir Baranov, Gray Scott, David Ihnen, Katie Doemland, Joe Ballou, Mybasicincome.org, Jack Wagner, Gerald Huff, John David Hodge, Michael Honey, Chris McCoy, Jan Smole, Danielle and Michael Texeira, Stephane Boisvert, Chris Smothers, Joel Leoj, Saura Naderi, Kai Wong, Miranda Midgely, Darrell, Nicolas Pouillard, Georg Baumann, Lisa Hallman, UBIGinc.org, Justin Hebert, Stuart Mark, Jill Weiss, Mark Witham, David Bijl, Andreas, Lawrence W Lee, Allen Bauer, Robert F. Greene, Erhan Altay, Robert Solovay, Masud Shah, Elizabeth Balcar, Casey Young, Thomas Welsh, Amy Shaffer, Kris Roadruck, Dave Shelton, Lee Irving, Kirk Israel, Tony DeStefano, Paolo Narciso, Victor Lau, Martin Jordo, Max Henrion, Catherine MacDonald, Arjun Banker, Walter Schaerer, Topher Hunt, Dan O’Sullivan, Louise Whitmore, all my other funders for their support, and my amazing partner, Katie Smith.

Would you like to see your name here too?

Scott Santens <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/">writes </a>and <a href="http://www.scottsantens.com/media-appearances">speaks </a>about the idea of unconditional basic income. You can follow him here on <a href="https://medium.com/@2noame">Medium </a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/scottsantens">Twitter </a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/scottsantens">Facebook </a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/scott-santens">HuffPo </a>, <a href="https://futurism.com/author/2noame/">Futurism </a>, <a href="https://steemit.com/@scottsantens">Steemit </a>, or <a href="http://www.reddit.com/user/2noame/">Reddit </a>where he is a moderator for the <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/basicincome/wiki">/r/BasicIncome </a>community of over 40,000 subscribers.

If you feel others should read this article, please click the heart to share.

The Cost of Universal Basic Income is the Net Transfer Amount, Not the Gross Price Tag

Basic or citizen's income

Related collections

Other curated ideas on this topic: