Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ: yes, now to handle possible option, we have to tackle one by one, supposely the position we called "x", and: if there is NO NEW creation at that point “x” => then there can be always traced back from "x" position to the current position right? current position to be considered you or me

Position "x"

Infinite regression is not possible, it must be ended to The First as The Uncaused Cause” (cosmological argument)Credited to Divya Ranjan Albert Einstein member of telegram messenger (@AlbertEinstein1905)Here i discussed this case with my smart friend “Divya Ranjan (telegram profile) and his twitter.I couldn’t simplify much better than him, to an argument “Does God exist?” I needed help, and he did, now once again he did help me for this argument — cosmological argument 🙏😊This is TLDR (too long don't read), unless your passionate fully charged on this case

Discussion

@AlbertEinstein1905:Surely humans weren't present from the very beginning of the universe.Universe was formed a few billion years ago.Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:yes consider it could be anything, just anything, particle/quark/string/etcnow let us point to farthest position we can think of, and stay there. the question is: can there be any creation starting from that position or ended at that position?

@AlbertEinstein1905: Well suppose you took “x” as somewhere close to 500 BCEThen yeah between x and the current position there has been no creation.And let’s be clear here.....by creation we mean the universal creation , right ?The creation that happens after the destruction of everything orthe creation that creates the very first particle Hopefully we're on the same page . I guess.

Previously Until Now

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:yes, now we can expand it a little bit more ... before “y” there are again & again previous new thingsmore to come the new one more than one infinitely@AlbertEinstein1905 :Yeah.... There are many pairs

@AlbertEinstein1905:you can't find the cause of x, at least to a specific sequence<ul><li>there could be anykind of timeline/sequence,</li><li>there could be different kind of causal chain</li><li>there could be more than one timeline of causality (causal chain)</li></ul>there could be more endpoints, more first causes, more gods

There Could Be More "Uncause Caused

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:you mean one big bang came from previous big bang?@AlbertEinstein1905 :Yeah..... But no creation isn’t really a possibility, because if there was no creation , how did we end up with this gigantic universe and where did everything came from.And yeah about there will always be a new creation.... That until now seems quite reasonable

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:yes, the creation that creates the "x" — before the "x", before 500 bce@AlbertEinstein1905 :Well there still was a universe.Um if you're talking about the very first point of creation, well that's unknown.

Before Previously

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:"x" may be represented as the sequence of anything. if we put "x" as part of the sequence of humanity, then going back to previous sequence may be considered finding the relevant creations (although not always be like that), it's to simplifying understanding, so that we can see the building blocks clearly, so that we can twist understanding properly within boundarythen now we can see "x" as it can be replaced with anything, we can replace "x" with universe or even smaller, then before "x" could be anything (another universe or else) as the cause of universe "x"

The Sequence

so if we consider there was nothing new at that position "x" then at least to that sequence there is no other creation, all summed up the same, there is no additional of something<ul><li>previous (typically book) <- "x" (book) -> current (typically book)</li><li>previous (typically matter) <- "x" (matter) -> current (typically matter)previous (typically human: grandmother etc) <- "x" (human) -> current (typically human: parent, me)</li><li>previous (typically universe) <- "x" (universe) -> current (typically universe)</li><li>previous (typically pencil) <- "x" (pencil) -> current (typically pencil)</li></ul>

@AlbertEinstein1905:So if y is before x , and if there is nothing new in xThen x and y have to be equal, not that they’re one and the same but that the things aren’t that different.So no creation happened in “y”

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:this is it, greatsupposely we admit there is a chance for a NEW creation at the farthest point we may have (as previous example, point "x"), then there will be an "y" as a NEW creation@AlbertEinstein1905:ok so you’re saying if there is the chances of creation at point x , then as y is the cause of x then the cause of creation must arise from Y , because everything that occurs at “x” is related to Y , so there must be creation at “y”

Creation Before Previously

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:doing so, will lead to the fact that , since x(n) created by x , and y was created/came from x, therefore there is the end point, it’s the x (the first cause)@AlbertEinstein1905:Ah....creation at x(n) is caused by “x”, and we had assumed in the beginning that x was also the cause of “y”, and y(n).But how is this the endpoint ?

Finally an Endpoint

Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:y(n) <- y100 <- y10 <- y <- x -> x(n)so since those are the new ones, then we can say there are the causes at the opposite direction<ul><li>"x" is the cause of y, y is the cause of y(n)</li><li>"x" (the cause of) -> x(n)</li><li>"x" (the cause of) -> y(n)</li></ul>@AlbertEinstein1905 :Okay as “x” is the cause of x(n) then the creation of x(n) is due to the creation in x , and thus x(n) is caused by x.

Causality At The Opposite

I don’t accept the final argument, “the consequence of infinity”. Preferably The First must be found not because of the absurdity of infinite regression, but because axiomatically there is no infinite regression. There is only finite chain of causation.Ⓢⓔⓡⓔⓜⓞⓝⓘⓐ:back to this, first human were present, monkey (they said), but what was the very previous one, can i say big bang?@AlbertEinstein1905 :Well it’s not sure yet.But the best concept we have until now , is yeah it’s big bang@AlbertEinstein1905 :Well see we have to get back to the very first particle that was ever present.

First Creation

@AlbertEinstein1905 :Um maybe not.Some theories say it's like a loop that'll happen again and again, I mean there would happen something that would totally destroy everything and then again another big bang would create another universe again.And this loop may go on forever

Loop of Creation

@AlbertEinstein1905 :Okay so you mean:if there is a universe x then it’s cause is the universe or anything that was before it.@AlbertEinstein1905 :Um there would be a previous thing, but as no creation happened so it wouldn’t have that many differences.The differences won't be there , but another thing might be present.So if we see no new thing in x then there's nothing that happened before it, otherwise it could've created something.

Causality At The Opposite

Similar ideas to Causality At The Opposite

Taking The Opposite View

The Law of the Opposite

The threats of being emphatic