I’m indebted to the Jungian therapist James Hollis for the insight that major personal decisions should be made not by asking, “Will this make me happy?”, but “Will this choice enlarge me or diminish me?”
We’re terrible at predicting what will make us happy: the question swiftly gets bogged down in our narrow preferences for security and control.
But the enlargement question elicits a deeper, intuitive response. You tend to just know whether, say, leaving or remaining in a relationship or a job, though it might bring short-term comfort, would mean cheating yourself of growth.
6
9 reads
CURATED FROM
Oliver Burkeman's last column: the eight secrets to a (fairly) fulfilled life
theguardian.com
11 ideas
·75 reads
IDEAS CURATED BY
The writer and journalist Oliver Burkeman shares a few lessons from his time writing his "This column will change your life" for the Guardian.
“
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about personaldevelopment with this collection
How to build a network while working remotely
How to work remotely
How to manage finances while working remotely
Related collections
Similar ideas to Choose “enlargement” over happiness
Major personal decisions should be made not by asking if it will make you happy, but if this choice will enlarge or diminish you.
We are not good at predicting what will make us happy - it makes us concentrate on our narrow preferences for security and control. Focusing on enlarge...
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates