to upgrade
Ideas from books, articles & podcasts.
There is a grain of truth to the myth. Namely, people do differ in their abilities and preferences. The VARK learning model, for example, classifies people as either visual, auditory, reading/writing, or kinesthetic (hands-on) learners. Each method is part of the learning process, and people will have their favourites. Such preferences are as true in education as anything else in life.
Many proponents believe learning styles are inheritable, emerge early in childhood, have a physiological basis, predict learning outcomes, and are immutable.
STASHED IN:
23
MORE IDEAS FROM THE SAME ARTICLE
People prefer brain-based accounts of behaviour, and they like to categorize people into types. Learning styles allow people to do both of those things.
A prevalent neuromyth is that of “learning styles.”
Engage with subjects in as many material ways as possible. Read, converse, seek out examples, get hands-on, and experiment. While we may have preferences, we should also challenge ourselves to try new methods and re-engage with less-favoured ones.
Why then does the learning styles myth survive despite the evidence and experts’ red-faced arguments? Because like all neuromyths, it tells us something we want to believe.
Recent studies found no supporting evidence that learning was enhanced by a slavish dedication to a student’s learning style
5 Reactions
Comment
created 15 ideas
1
2
621 reads
created 4 ideas
8
Comment
3.77K reads
❤️ Brainstash Inc.