Something is impossible because there is no possibility for something to be exist. You don't even find any examples anywhere to prove the possibility of something to be considered impossible.
So, if you reject the possibility of the truth of an argument but accompanied with examples, it means that you are testing the truth of the argument without involving any possible examples. It's ridiculous, it's absurd.
It's like an atheist saying "God doesn't exist". Theist said "this is an example of intelligent computers must has a creator as well as intelligent humans there must be a God as creator".
2
29 reads
CURATED FROM
IDEAS CURATED BY
IN GOD WE TRUST I am free not because i have choices, but i am free because i rely on God with quality assured
Beware of Thinking Delusion That May Lead To Absolute Absurdity
“
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about philosophy with this collection
Understanding the concept of the self
The importance of living in the present moment
The illusion of control
Related collections
Similar ideas
The Teleological argument (also known as intelligent design argument) is an argument for the existence of God, an intelligent creator based on perceived evidence of intelligent design in the natural world.
What is the wisdom behind this? Simple.
That when you deny something, something must have absolutely no trace, no trace of its truth, nothing in any way to trace its possibility, not the slightest hint of its possibility in...
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates