Something is impossible because there is no possibility for something to be exist. You don't even find any examples anywhere to prove the possibility of something to be considered impossible.

So, if you reject the possibility of the truth of an argument but accompanied with examples, it means that you are testing the truth of the argument without involving any possible examples. It's ridiculous, it's absurd.

It's like an atheist saying "God doesn't exist". Theist said "this is an example of intelligent computers must has a creator as well as intelligent humans there must be a God as creator".

This is so ridiculous. It's like saying this...

• "I can't believe this exists, although there is an example for the possibility."

Impossibility means asserting that there is no single example. While possibility indicates an example.

Axiom

🧩 An example indicates it is not necessarily certain, but it has possibility, so that those who refuse to consider the possibilities exemplified are ridiculous in reasoning (have been exposed to delusions in thinking)

Then the atheists argued incoherently "we already knew that computers were made, by this company, it's because we saw the creator, but I didn't see who made this planet". This is so ridiculous. It's like saying this...

• "I can't believe this exists, because it couldn't have happened." Impossibility means asserting that there is no single example. While possibility indicates an example.

Axiom

🧩 An example indicates it is not necessarily certain, but it has possibility, so that those who refuse to consider the possibilities exemplified are ridiculous in reasoning (delusions in thinking)

So it's ridiculous, silly, absurd, when atheists said "this was impossible" when in fact there were examples for the possibility.

If we say "this is impossible" but there are examples that make it possible, then the impossibility can be doubted and the probability can be expected.

• Do you want to emphasize that something is sweet because you have never tried it?
• Do you want to emphasize that something is sweet because there aren't even any signs that confirm it's sweet or not?
• Do you want to assert that something is true because there is no preliminary evidence to hint at its possibility.

Or do you want to assert that this is true or that it is impossible because "iiiiiieklmbm-+!s=x/ikmkuKk*k" ???

Or do you want to assert that this is true or that it is impossible because of "......." ???

Again, the refusal must be accompanied by evidence of the absence of any evidence of its possibility.

If you reject something that is possible by example, then your rejection cannot be finished (unsolved)

If I reject the concept of the truth, then certainly there is no example anywhere that proves the possibility of a concept of the truth.

Axiom

🧩 If a thing is impossible, then there can't be a single example indicates a chance of a thing itself to be predicted - possible to happen

IF YOU REJECT SOMETHING PROVEN POSSIBLE THROUGH EXAMPLE, THEN YOU HAVE BEEN TOTALLY ABSURD.

Don't get caught up in delusional thinking that will give result in being completely absurd - absolute absurdity.