While the premises may be true in an argument, the conclusion may or may not be correct, making the argument invalid. Example of an incorrect argument: Some New Yorkers are rude, some of them are artists, therefore some artists are rude.
A counterexample method is a powerful way to prove an argument’s conclusion to be invalid. You can use this method by: isolating the argument form and then constructing an argument with the same form that is obviously invalid.
81
737 reads
CURATED FROM
IDEAS CURATED BY
Creator. Unapologetic student. Lifelong coffee ninja. Internet nerd. Bacon lover.
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about problemsolving with this collection
Creating a productive schedule
Avoiding procrastination
Prioritizing tasks effectively
Related collections
Similar ideas to The "counterexample method"
The counterexample method is effective at exposing the invalidity of deductive arguments.
At its core, an argument consists of a conclusion and one or more premises, or claims.
It does not use reasons that contradict each other, contradict the conclusion or explicitly or implicitly assumes the truth of the conclusion. Checklist:
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates