The contemporary debate between atheists and believers is premised on the idea that the word ‘God’ either represents something in the real world, or it does not.
Wittgensteinian approach to the debate begins by pointing out ‘God’ is a word that has different meanings in the context of different communities:
14
37 reads
CURATED FROM
Meaning is use: Wittgenstein on the limits of language - Philosophy for change
philosophyforchange.wordpress.com
7 ideas
·294 reads
IDEAS CURATED BY
Life-long learner. Passionate about leadership, entrepreneurship, philosophy, Buddhism & SF. Founder @deepstash.
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about philosophy with this collection
How to beat procrastination
How to enhance your creative thinking
How to create a smooth transition in a new endeavor
Related collections
Similar ideas to Wittgenstein’s God
Believing in a God may have lots of benefits. Atheists may be more neurotic compared to theists. But this, Watts believes, is not an argument for God. Because the lack or neuroticism does not prove the God hypothesis.
Another way to look at it is to say that “If ignora...
When responding to appeals to definition, it is useful to know the terms denotation, which is the literal meaning of a word, and connotation, which is a feeling the word evokes beyond its denotation.
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates