The assumptions in Pascal‘s wager - Deepstash
Being a Graphic Designer in the Modern World

Learn more about career with this collection

How to create a strong portfolio

How to network and market yourself as a designer

How to manage time and prioritize tasks

Being a Graphic Designer in the Modern World

Discover 62 similar ideas in

It takes just

10 mins to read

The assumptions in Pascal‘s wager

The assumptions in Pascal‘s wager

  1. Both the existence & non-existence of God are impossible to prove by human reasoning.
  2. One must "wager" by weighing the consequences of the decision to believe/not believe in God.
  3. No one can refuse to participate; withholding assent is impossible because we are already "embarked", and effectively living out the choice.

4

93 reads

MORE IDEAS ON THIS

Pascal's argument for beleiving in god

Pascal's argument for beleiving in god

Pascal argues that the wise decision is to wager that God exists, since one can gain eternal life in heaven if God exists, but if not, one will be no worse off in death than if one had not believed. On the other hand, if you bet against God and lose, you are unavoidably a...

6

90 reads

Criticisms of Pascal's wager

Criticisms of Pascal's wager

  1. The interest one has in believing God is not proof of God's existence.
  2. Since there have been many religions throughout history, there is a high probability of believing in "the wrong god". (

4

81 reads

Pascal‘s wager

Pascal‘s wager

Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument for God, presented by the 17th-century French philosopher, Blaise Pascal, who posits that human beings bet with their lives when deciding to believe in God (or not).

4

135 reads

CURATED FROM

IDEAS CURATED BY

eeswari

Just a queer, brown, psychology undergraduate ranting about random things I come across. I organize my thoughts in little, informative chunks and try to cite my sources. #psychology #society #marxism #philosophy #leftist #LGBTQ #gay #trans #queer

Related collections

Other curated ideas on this topic:

Criticisms of the Teleological argument

Criticisms of the Teleological argument

  1. The argument does not prove that the intelligent designer is God.
  2. An intelligent designer must be far more complex than anything it is capable of designing, and the existence of life, let alone something more complex than it, is very impropable.
  3. ...

Read & Learn

20x Faster

without
deepstash

with
deepstash

with

deepstash

Personalized microlearning

100+ Learning Journeys

Access to 200,000+ ideas

Access to the mobile app

Unlimited idea saving

Unlimited history

Unlimited listening to ideas

Downloading & offline access

Supercharge your mind with one idea per day

Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.

Email

I agree to receive email updates