Dot & Line - Deepstash

# Dot & Line

Ideas, facts & insights covering these topics:

7 ideas

Β·

Explore the World's Best Ideas

Join today and uncover 100+ curated journeys from 50+ topics. Unlock access to our mobile app with extensive features.

## Understanding Dimension

I wanted to talk about dimensions from the axiom and geometry point of view.

This is very good at demonstrating the precision of the axioms in looking at this issue.

And the discussion of this dimension trains us to be careful in observing "existence" from the point of view of an ontology.

We will look at the concept of dimension from an axiom point of view.

Apart from them globally already knowing what & how to form dimensions geometrically, they still need to be seen from the axiom point of view, so that the thin boundaries can be seen.

2

## The Difference

Although the way of seeing it was different, the result will be the same in between the axiomatic concept and the general concept. That's because the general concept was built through a valid - definite geometric system.

The difference is only in translating different geometric concepts from the concepts in the axioms

2

## Dimension of Reality

From the axiom point of view

Like I said, when I said "dimension" this meant the "effect" of Godβ. Because God is not a dimension, but dimensions are inside God.

2

## Divine Dimension

We recognized the concept of dimensions since we were born into the world. And the concept of dimensions was formed through the reality of life which was the "effect" (creation) of God.

2

## Dots or Lines

π1 Dimensional geometry = line

π1 Dimension axioms = dot

When there was "effect" ( a thing) for the first time, then without "existence" there could be no "effect". So the smallest was "existence".

"Existence" as the minimal "a thing", certainly doesn't have any attributes, so it's the same in all directions, that's the point. So axiomatically "dot" more accurately represents the concept of "existence".

But in the geometry version "dot" is considered null, empty, so the concept of "exist in the beginning" in geometric shape that were placed after the "dot" as a line, it's an absurdity

2

## The Dot In The Beginning

The "lines" have shown differences as there will be no minimum attributes.

If you want to call "the dot" geometrically , it means itβs not a "dot" but "emptiness" outside geometry.

"Dot" actually already has a width (axiomatically), because a dot actually has a width the same we found on a line.

The difference is that βthe dotβ concept is more precise because βthe dotβ does not show certain characteristics. And this more characterizes the initial concept of "effect" that is "exist" (previously no profile).

The concept of "dot" in geometry was considered to be the beginning of all forms.

2

## Dot at Axiom Level

At the axiom level, the beginning of all forms is a void, not a "dot", because the "dot" has a position next after the emptiness, in the sense that "the dot" already has a form.

Only a matter of different concepts between axioms & geometry, but rooted in the same thing which is the "beginning" of all (before) changing

2

IDEAS CURATED BY

IN GOD WE TRUST I am free not because i have choices, but i am free because i rely on God with quality assured

CURATOR'S NOTE

Dot & Lines from The Concept of Dimension

β

## Similar ideas

20x Faster

without
deepstash

with
deepstash

with

deepstash

Personalized microlearning

β

100+ Learning Journeys

β

β

β

Unlimited idea saving

β

β

Unlimited history

β

β

Unlimited listening to ideas

β

β