The speed reading fallacy: the case for slow reading

Speed reading can help you skim to content, which is useful at times. However, speed reading cannot help you read faster and retain more information.

• Our eyes are designed only to see a tiny portion of our visual field with the precision needed to recognise a letter in a 10 to 12 point font. Everything outside that small area is blurry. The idea promoted by speed reading that we can use our peripheral vision to see whole sentences is biologically impossible.
• While we spend most of our time reading forward, our eyes often go back to reread some text. This is the way our brain links content together. Speed reading attempts to help you read faster by showing one word at a time. This has a bad impact on overall comprehension.

• Mental reading is when you sound out each word in your head. This is the slowest form of reading.
• Auditory reading is when you listen to an audiobook. This reading is almost twice as fast as mental reading, at about 450 words per minute.
• Visual reading is when you understand the meaning of the words without sounding them out or hearing them, with a reading speed of 700 words per minute.

Instead of aiming for speed, we should optimise for comprehension and retention.

• Slow reading has a positive impact on your anxiety levels.
• It may help you read more, as you can take the time to enjoy what you read.
• It will improve your learning. Your brain can make useful connections between current and previous content.