If life were all about luck, the same people wouldn’t repeatedly do great things(Einstein, Elon Musk, Newton). When someone repeatedly does great things it is because they prepared in advance to recognize, work on, and fill in the blanks when necessary.

Intelligent preparation > Luck

<ul><li>Believe that you are capable of doing important things. </li><li>Be willing to look like an idiot. </li><li>Strive for excellence. </li><li>You need the feedback of reality in order to keep your feet planted on the ground. </li><li>Focused investment of only one hour a day can double your lifetime output. </li><li>Tolerate ambiguity. </li></ul>

How to Do Great Things 

<div>
Insight is rarely handed to you on a silver platter. Einstein argued that genius was 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. While we can acknowledge that luck plays a role, we often use that as a crutch to avoid doing what we can do to intelligently prepare for opportunities. 
We only get one life, "and it seems to be it is better to do significant things than to just get along through life to its end," writes Richard Hamming in his book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07CSX7TCM/ref=as_li_qf_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=farnamstreet-20&amp;creative=9325&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;creativeASIN=B07CSX7TCM&amp;linkId=0a2b571810ec6b18c3b2feeb0d334bd9">The Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn</a>. 
The book explores how we do great things. And wouldn't we all like to do great things? But what are the methods we should employ in order to do great things? What are the mental disciplines that we should learn? Where do we start?
Hamming starts by arguing the way you live your life-the extent to which you intelligent prepare-makes a huge difference. 
<blockquote>
The major objection cited by people against striving to do great things is the belief it is all a matter of luck. I have repeatedly cited Pasteur's remark, "Luck favors the prepared mind". It both admits there is an element of luck, and yet claims to a great extent it is up to you. You prepare yourself to succeed, or not, as you choose, from moment to moment, by the way you live your life. 
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 209)</cite>
</blockquote>
In any great outcome, there is a component of luck. Yet if life were all about luck, the same people wouldn't repeatedly do great things. Einstein did many great things. So did Newton. Elon Musk has been successful in multiple fields. The list goes on. 
When someone repeatedly does great things it is because they prepared in advance to advance to recognize, work on, and fill in the blanks when necessary. This is the essence of intelligent preparation. 
Intelligence comes in many forms and flavors. A lot of the time it's not easily recognized - a lot of people who repeatedly do great things were poor students. IQ does not ensure academic success. Brains are nice to have but they are even better if you know how to use them. 
<h2>How to Do Great Things</h2>
You need to believe that you are capable of doing important things<g>.</g> Your mindset determines how you experience things, what you work on, and the tactics and strategies you employ to accomplish those goals. 
<blockquote>
Among the important properties to have is the belief you can do important things. If you do not work on important problems how can you expect to do important work? Yet, direct observation, and direct questioning of people, shows most scientists spend most of their time working on things they believe are not important nor are they likely to lead to important things.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 210).</cite>
</blockquote>
If what you are working on is not important and aligned with your goals-and <a href="https://fs.blog/2013/10/what-you-do-today-is-not-essential/">a lot of what you do and say isn't</a>-then why are you doing it? The question you need to ask yourself if "why are you not working on and thinking about the important problems in your area?" How can we expect to achieve great things if we are not <a href="https://fs.blog/2014/08/richard-feynman-what-problems-to-solve/">working on the right problems</a>? 
You need to be willing to look like an idiot. Think of this as confidence meets courage. 
<blockquote>
[Claude] Shannon had courage. Who else but a man with almost infinite courage would ever think of averaging over all random codes and expect the average code would be good? He knew what he was doing was important and pursued it intensely. Courage, or confidence, is a property to develop in yourself. Look at your successes, and pay less attention to failures than you are usually advised to do in the expression, "Learn from your mistakes". While playing chess Shannon would often advance his queen boldly into the fray and say, "I ain't of nothing". I learned to repeat it to myself when stuck, and at times it has enabled me to go on to <g>a success</g>. I deliberately copied a part of the style of a great scientist. The courage to continue is essential since great research often has long periods with no success and many discouragements.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 211)</cite>
</blockquote>
You need to strive for excellence. This isn't as easy as it sounds but it as an essential feature of doing great work. 
<blockquote>
Without such a goal you will tend to wander like a drunken sailor. The sailor takes one step in one direction and the next in some independent direction. As a result the steps tend to cancel each other, and the expected distance from the starting point is proportional to the square root of the number of steps taken. With a vision of excellence, and with the goal of doing significant work, there is tendency for the steps to go in the same direction and thus go a distance proportional to the number of steps taken, which in a lifetime is a large number indeed.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 211)</cite>
</blockquote>
The conditions you think you want are rarely the ones that help you produce your best work. You need the feedback of reality in order to keep your feet planted on the ground. 
<blockquote>
Age is <g>a factor</g> physicists and mathematicians worry about. It is easily observed the greatest work of a theoretical physicist, mathematician, or astrophysicist, is generally done very early. They may continue to do good work all their lives, but what society ends up valuing most is almost always their earliest great work. The exceptions are very, very few indeed. But in literature, music composition, and politics, age seems to be an asset. The best compositions of a composer are usually the late ones, as judged by popular opinion. 
One reason for this is fame in Science is a curse to quality <g>productivity</g>, though it tends to supply all the tools and freedom you want to do great things. Another reason is most famous people, sooner or later, tend to think they can only work on important problems-hence they fail to plant the little acorns which grow into the mighty oak trees. I have seen it many times, from Brattain of transistor fame and a Nobel Prize to Shannon and his Information Theory. Not that you should merely work on random things-but on small things which seem to you to have the possibility of future growth. In my <g>opinion</g> the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, N.J has ruined more great scientists than any other place has created-considering what they did before ore and what they did after going there. A few, like von Neumann, escaped the closed atmosphere of the place with all its physical comforts and <g>prestige,</g> and continued to contribute to the advancement of Science, but most remained there and continued to work on the same problems which got them there but which were generally no longer of great importance to society.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 211)</cite>
</blockquote>
Work with your door open.
<blockquote>
orking with one's door closed lets you get more work done per year than if you had an open door, but I have observed repeatedly later those with the closed doors, while working just as hard as others, seem to work on slightly the wrong problems, while those who have let their door stay open get less work done but tend to work on the right problems! I cannot prove the cause and effect relationship, I only observed the correlation. I suspect the open mind leads to the open door, and the open door tends to lead to <g>the open</g> mind; they reinforce each other.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 211)</cite>
</blockquote>
People who do great things typically have a great drive to do things. <blockquote>
I had worked with John Tukey for some years before I found he was essentially my age, so I went to our mutual boss and asked him, "How can anyone my age know as much as John Tukey does?" He leaned back, grinned, and said, "You would be surprised how much you would know if you had worked as hard as he has for as many years". There was nothing for me to do but slink out of his office, which I did. I thought about the remark for some weeks and decided, while I could never work as hard as John did, I could do a lot better than I had been doing.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 212)</cite>
</blockquote>
Focused investment of only one hour a day can double your lifetime output. Intelligent preparation is like compound interest, the more you invest the more situations you can handle, the more you learn how to do, so the more you can do, etc. The investment of <a href="https://fs.blog/2013/05/the-buffett-formula-how-to-get-smarter/">one hour a day</a> by <a href="https://fs.blog/charlie-munger/">Charlie Munger</a> to learning new things is an overlooked gem hiding in plain sight.
This isn't about who works the hardest but rather who focuses their limited energy on the right things. Learning things that (1) change slowly and (2) apply to a wide variety of situations could be a better use of time than learning something incredibly time-consuming, rapidly changing, and of limited application. 
Hamming dedicated his Friday afternoons to "great thoughts." Setting aside time to think is a common <g>charasteristic</g> of people that do great things. Not only does this help you <a href="https://fs.blog/principles/">live consciously</a> it helps get your head out of the weeds. The rest of us are too busy with the details to ask if we're <a href="https://fs.blog/2018/03/speed-velocity/">going in the right direction.</a>
People who do great things tolerate ambiguity - they can both believe and not believe at the same time. 
<blockquote>
You must be able to believe your organization and field of research is the best there is, but also there is much room for improvement! You can sort of see why this is a necessary trait If you believe too much you will not likely see the chances for significant improvements, you will see believe enough you will be filled with doubts and get very little chances for only the 2%, 5%, and 10% improvements; if you do not done. I have not the faintest idea of how to teach the tolerance of ambiguity, both belief and disbelief at the same time, but great people do it all the time. Most great people also have 10 to 20 problems they regard as basic and of great importance, and which they currently do not know how to solve. They keep them in their mind, hoping to get a clue as to how to solve them. When a clue does appear they generally drop other things and get to work immediately on the important problem. Therefore they tend to come in first, and the others who come in later are soon forgotten. I must warn you however, the importance of the result is not the measure of the importance of the problem. The three problems in Physics, antigravity, teleportation, and time travel are seldom worked on because we have so few clues as to how to start-a problem is important partly because there is a possible attack on it, and not because of its inherent importance.
<cite>Hamming, Richard R.. Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (Page 213)</cite>
</blockquote>
</div>

Insight is rarely handed to you on a silver platter. Einstein argued that genius was 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. While we can acknowledge that luck plays a role, we often use that as a crutch to avoid doing what we can do to intelligently prepare for opportunities.

How to Do Great Things

Intelligent preparation > Luck

How to Do Great Things

Asiya R's ideas are part of this journey:

Related collections

Similar ideas