Ideas from books, articles & podcasts.
This is the resolution of the classical “Zeno’s paradox” as commonly stated:
The reason objects can move from one location to another (i.e., travel a finite distance) in a finite amount of time is not because their velocities are not only always finite, but because they do not change in time unless acted upon by an outside force.
If you take a person like Atalanta moving at a constant speed, she will cover any distance in an amount of time put forth by the equation that relates distance to velocity.
MORE IDEAS FROM THE SAME ARTICLE
It’s eminently possible that the time it takes to finish each step will still go down: half the original time, a third of the original time, etc, but that the total journey will take an infinite amount of time.
This reasoning is only good enough to show that the total distance you must travel converges to a finite value. It doesn’t tell you anything about how long it takes to reach your destination.
Rate is the amount that one quantity (distance) changes as another quantity (time) changes as well.
To go from her starting point to her destination, Atalanta must first travel half of the total distance.
Many thinkers, both ancient and contemporary, tried to resolve this paradox by invoking the idea of time.
The oldest “solution” to the paradox was done from a purely mathematical perspective. The claim admits that, sure, there might be an infinite number of jumps that you’d need to take, but each new jump gets smaller and smaller than the previous one. Therefore, as long as you could demonstrate that...
created 2 ideas
created 12 ideas
I have always been interested in the concept of time and time travel, as it is always as mind boggling as it is simple, and this article I found useful to introduce paradoxes which arise as part of time travel.
❤️ Brainstash Inc.