Why people care about the royal family

People identify with people. While politicians come and go, the royal family creates a sense of human continuity at the centre of society.

History shows that rebels and non-conformists in the family can create more affection than good ones. Diana, the maverick Princess, topped many of the royal popularity polls all over the world.

Saisha  (@saisha) - Profile Photo

@saisha

🌻

Self Improvement

MORE IDEAS FROM THE ARTICLE

Why Britain has a royal family

For centuries, virtually every country in the western world had some sort of king and royal family.

Some people in republics like France or the United States will say that clever people grew out of them. Monarchy lovers will respond that really clever countries kept their monarchies. They argue that royal families embody their country's human roots and identity. Brave kings and queens often become symbols of their nation's unity in times of war or crises.

The role of the royal family across the Commonwealth is that of morale boosters.

Younger family members are expected to join the armed forces or participate in some useful social service. Royal people present medals to brave soldiers and cups to sporting teams. They are expected to set a good example wherever they go.

The royal family take their titles from the English shires - York, Lancaster, Gloucester, Cornwall.

  • Prince Charles is Duke of Cornwall
  • Prince Andrew is Duke of York
  • Prince Edward is Earl of Wessex

For the next generation of royals,

  • Prince William is Duke of Cambridge
  • Prince Harry is Duke of Sussex

In term of precedence, the five male titles of the peerage are Duke, Marquess, Earl, Viscount and Baron. Duke is the highest and most exclusive.

  • Critics say the institution of the monarchy is old-fashioned and artificially maintaining privileges of a bygone era.
  • When the young royal joins the armed forces, they are automatically made officers, leading to inequality and hierarchy.
  • Others complain that royals do insufficient work for the tax-payers money.
  • Constitutionally, the splendour of the monarchy allows politicians to hide behind unearned 'palace prestige.'
  • Atheists, agnostics, and free-thinkers condemn the royal family's endorsement of the Church of England.
  • The present Queen received her title in 1952 from her father, George VI, whose claim went through his father, George V, to Queen Victoria.
  • Today, the line of succession of the House of Windsor runs through Prince Charles (1), to his son Prince William (2) and then to his eldest son Prince George (3).

Succession runs through the male heirs, except when no male heirs are available. That law changed in 2015 for members of the royal family born after 28 October 2011.

Briitish taxpayers fund the royal family, which totalled ÂŁ82.2m in 2018/19. This paid for their 3,200 royal engagements at home and abroad, with over 160,000 guests being welcomed at royal palaces for events. It also financed the reservicing of Buckingham Palace for ÂŁ85m over the next five years.

While that is a lot of money, in 2016 alone, over 2.7 million tourists visited Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, and other key royal attractions, boosting Britains tourist revenues by ÂŁ550m.

The British royal family survived by being more open and flexible than many others.

The French monarchy was destroyed in a blood-bath in the 1790s because it aligned itself with an oppressive aristocratic upper class who exploited the people. In contrast, the British royal family kept company with merchants and entrepreneurs and was encouraging scientific research. Generally, the British kings accepted the will of the people as expressed through parliament.

In a representative people's monarchy, the people have the power while the monarch has none.

The British royal family are not supposed to express political opinions. When Elizabeth II reads out the policies of 'Her' government in the Queen's Speech at the Opening of Parliament, she represents the power of the people whose votes put the prime minister of the moment into office. She is a mouthpiece of that government but does not express her own opinions.

Deepstash helps you become inspired, wiser and productive, through bite-sized ideas from the best articles, books and videos out there.

GET THE APP:

RELATED IDEAS

biographer Sally Bedell Smith

"By the ’80s, he [Prince Philip] had written nine books. He was the first person in the royal family to use television. He did a television documentary. He persuaded the Queen in 1957 to televise her annual Christmas message. And he even taught her how to use a teleprompter. He was the first member of the royal family to use a computer … He picked up the phone, but also wrote all his own emails. He wrote his speeches. He was a man of searching intellect, great curiosity."

8

IDEAS

Prince Philip: A Husband But Never A King

Prince Philip was never in line for the throne (his eldest son stands to inherit it) and never held the title of king.

The reason for that: in the British monarchy, a woman who marries the monarch can use the ceremonial title of queen - but men who marry the monarch can't use the title king, which can only be used by male sovereigns.

Hundred Years’ War

 ... was an intermittent struggle between England and France in the 14th–15th century over a series of disputes over territories & the question of the legitimate succession to the French crown:

  • As the English kings started as Dukes of Normandy, their continental territories were a constant source of conflict.
  • When the last Capet dynasty died without an heir, the English king Edward III claimed to have the rightful ruler of France over the newly Valois king, Philip the VI.

Initially, the English won quite a few battles but failed to unite England and France under one crown.

© Brainstash, Inc

AboutCuratorsJobsPress KitTopicsTerms of ServicePrivacy PolicySitemap