Keep reading for FREE
Worse? They are trapped by their own game, like mathematicians fiddling with formulas. That’s the philosopher who tinkers with meaning and then trapped himself into atheism.
Furthermore the atheist maestro (Richard Dawkins) or whoever successors have been able to master stirring up reasoning, sophism & various other chaotic movement that are able presenting beautiful harmony? But it turned out that the music they played was an orchestra in a dream. Their claims are so unrealistic.
They're unrealistic because they are not completely realistic...!!!
If you understand this, you will laugh
MORE IDEAS ON THIS
There’s no way you’d want to prove the existence of "dancing cakes" without an example from the world of cake.
Likewise, when you want to prove the existence of God, of course you need initial information that allows for the existence of God...
What model do you use to think?
🔰 Impossible gives no chance , while possible indicates there is chance
🔰 It is possible for a thing to be true because similar example can be found, while something is confirmed to be true because the truth is realized
🔰 If a thing is impossible, then there can't be a single examp...
It’s like someone trying to think of a form of impossibility. Whereas there has never been an example or there is no trace of a piece called impossibility. Even if you say "something is impossible", that is the opposite of the possible reality (there is a reality involved...
It is always necessary to have a realistic comparison model!
If you deny that there is no Creator - God, even though your own reasoning admits that for “a product” there needs to be a maker. Then they (atheists) argued "yes, it’s clear someo...
What if the ethical model you use is taken from the ethics prevailing in other countries? It could be irrelevant. Does that mean misguided thinking? NO!
Relevant thinking models? No. Doesn’t a relevant thinking model mean a realistic thinkin...
What is your standard of truth? The standard of truth of people living on the "bezelbug bradiboy" planet or the standardization of the "local" community?
MORE SIMPLE. What is your standard of testing correctness?
It’s a thinking model at worst. Beware of Unequal Comparison in Thinking
I wanted to highlight the problem of a fundamental fallacy, beyond the logical fallacy recognized in a dictionary for logical thinking
What is the wisdom behind this? Simple.
That when you deny something, something must have absolutely no trace, no trace of its truth, nothing in any way to trace its possibility, not the slightest hint of its possibility in...
Let’s try to turn thoughts around without getting dizzy. We try to twist the meaning, change the meaning of words, without losing the common thread. Without losing the basic structure
If irrelevant means unrealistic? Then as long as it’s rea...
Someone asked "can we draw something unique that is unthinkable"? Of course it’s impossible. Even if it was possible, it would have been thought of by the others and then shared with the questioner
So it is not something that is unthinkable,...
That in the end finding certainty, that’s another story, but the main mission is exploring the possibility.
If it is possible then it can be confirmed. If it is possible 0.9, then it could be rounded to 1 certainty.
Yes, because even though your way of thinking is relevant, it makes sense, it’s been this & that’s it, but it’s still not realistic! What? ️
Yep. You're not realistic if you are not completely realistic! Sorry, this isn't a philosophical sta...
To test means to compare the tested with the standard of truth.
So, every time you test something, of course you involve standardization. As simple as that.
My question is, what is your standard of truth? We ar...
Or more unrealistic...
"can " .... " "...." then "...." and "...." so that "...."? Difficult isn’t it! Why? Because there are no traces. There are no cheat sheets, there is not even the slightest cheat. HOW CAN YOU ENSURE THE POSSIBILITY OF ...
IN GOD WE TRUST I am free not because i have choices, but i am free because i rely on God with quality assured
Thinking Model At Worst
Ready for the next level?
Read Like a Pro
Explore the World’s
Save ideas for later reading, for personalized stashes, or for remembering it later.
# Personal Growth
Take Your Ideas
Just press play and we take care of the words.
No Internet access? No problem. Within the mobile app, all your ideas are available, even when offline.
Ideas for your next work project? Quotes that inspire you? Put them in the right place so you never lose them.
2 Million Stashers
Great interesting short snippets of informative articles. Highly recommended to anyone who loves information and lacks patience.
This app is LOADED with RELEVANT, HELPFUL, AND EDUCATIONAL material. It is creatively intellectual, yet minimal enough to not overstimulate and create a learning block. I am exceptionally impressed with this app!
Best app ever! You heard it right. This app has helped me get back on my quest to get things done while equipping myself with knowledge everyday.
Don’t look further if you love learning new things. A refreshing concept that provides quick ideas for busy thought leaders.
Even five minutes a day will improve your thinking. I've come across new ideas and learnt to improve existing ways to become more motivated, confident and happier.
Brilliant. It feels fresh and encouraging. So many interesting pieces of information that are just enough to absorb and apply. So happy I found this.
I have only been using it for a few days now, but I have found answers to questions I had never consciously formulated, or to problems I face everyday at work or at home. I wish I had found this earlier, highly recommended!
Great for quick bits of information and interesting ideas around whatever topics you are interested in. Visually, it looks great as well.
Read & Learn
Access to 200,000+ ideas
Access to the mobile app
Unlimited idea saving & library
Unlimited listening to ideas
Downloading & offline access
Claim Your Limited Offer
Get Deepstash Pro