When the opposition is logical and the detractor has many rational and practical counterarguments, one has to go for a cognitive conversation.
The Flip Side: Don’t expect long-term conversion or everlasting support.
423
1.72K reads
CURATED FROM
IDEAS CURATED BY
The idea is part of this collection:
Learn more about communication with this collection
Identifying the skills needed for the future
Developing a growth mindset
Creating a culture of continuous learning
Related collections
Similar ideas to Changing People’s Minds: Cognitive Conversation Approach
Engaging in a rational debate is useless when the detractor isn’t really a fan and harbours a grievance already.
The detractor can be wholeheartedly opposed to your proposal, even believing that it may cause harm. This makes it impossible for them to agree with you.
Read & Learn
20x Faster
without
deepstash
with
deepstash
with
deepstash
Personalized microlearning
—
100+ Learning Journeys
—
Access to 200,000+ ideas
—
Access to the mobile app
—
Unlimited idea saving
—
—
Unlimited history
—
—
Unlimited listening to ideas
—
—
Downloading & offline access
—
—
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates