Many tech companies have embraced home and hybrid work, such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Spotify etc. Something similar is happening in the financial sector. Trade unions are working on templates for home working agreements to minimise the risk of isolation and health and safety risks from working in an unsuitable environment. The least focus is on the inequality, what work involves, and how companies try to offload responsibility on individuals.

Home and hybrid working

<ul><li>Studies show that only a minority are able to work from home.</li><li>WFH may take away human interaction from some people.</li><li>Not being in an office may cut one from the collective workplace experiences.</li><li>Gender roles. American research showed that 79% of men experienced "positive work effectiveness" compared with 37% of women.</li><li>WFH also increase the average working day by 8.2%,</li><li>Computer surveillance.</li></ul> However, the real problem is that employers have built a model of home working on workplace cultures.

Work from home drawbacks

Instead of being fixated on home working, we should begin with flexibility, where people start and finish at times of their choosing, set free time and ensure that they make space for holidays. Companies should pair new recruits with dedicated mentors. Employees should have collective representation and the right to disconnect.

Improving people's lives

It was Omicron that did it. Up until early December, office workers in England seemed to be steadily returning to their desks. But once the new variant had arrived, a change that had been taking shape since the Covid crisis started suddenly felt irresistible. Back-to-the-office schedules <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/17/us-omicron-return-to-office-plans-employers" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">were binned</a>, more companies announced long-term plans for so-called hybrid employment split between homes and workplaces, and there it was: a quiet revolution, whose consequences will unfold over the next year and beyond.Home and hybrid working has been embraced by a <a href="https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/companies-switching-remote-work-long-term/" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">long list</a> of tech companies that includes Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Spotify and dozens more. Something similar seems to be happening in the financial sector. In the UK, <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8c231f78-82c4-4028-91c4-e091b8c4a3f9" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">18m sq ft</a> of office space has been vacated since the start of the pandemic. In the past year, in such places as Derby, Southampton and the London borough of Brent around 20% of offices have been taken out of use, and there are projections that between now and 2027, one in 10 British offices will no longer be needed.For all the government’s wishful thinking about a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/09/nadhim-zahawi-denies-there-is-plan-to-end-free-lateral-flow-covid-tests" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">looming return</a> to pre-Covid normality, this looks like deep, era-defining change. Talk to people in trade unions, and you get a sense of a new frontier that demands urgent and careful attention. At the union Unite, for example, they are working on a <a href="https://www.unitetheunion.org/news-events/news/2021/august/unite-vows-to-protect-homeworkers-from-attacks-on-their-pay-and-conditions/" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">detailed template</a> for home working agreements, designed to minimise the risk of isolation, “stress and depression” and “health and safety risks from working in an unsuitable environment”. So far, though, any political debate about what is happening has reduced everything to yet another instalment of the culture wars. The <a href="https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-mp-jake-berry-ridiculed-25134111" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">right seems to see</a> any move away from the traditional workplace as a <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1474300/duncan-smith-iain-redundancies-working-from-home-economy-uk-jobs-loss-latest-news-vn" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">mortal threat</a> to both the economy and our moral wellbeing, while more <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/opinion/remote-work-from-home-office.html" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">liberal voices</a> glimpse something almost utopian: liberation from the daily commute, increased productivity, more family time. What both sides tend to ignore are massive issues about inequality, what work actually involves, and the way that big companies too often try to offload responsibility and risk on to fragile individuals.For a start, only a minority of us are actually able to work from home (WFH). In April 2020, the Office for National Statistics put the figure <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/coronavirusandhomeworkingintheuk/april2020" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">at 46%</a>, although the number varied wildly across the UK: 57% of Londoners said they were able to do at least some work at home, whereas the figure in the West Midlands was 35%. In that context, even if home working ushers some of those who do it into an idyll of autonomy and holistic living, it threatens to make the class divisions that the pandemic widened both permanent and huge.Other questions centre on the people who now do at least some of their work not far from where they sleep. If you live alone, WFH may well represent both a degree of freedom and a snatching-away of human interaction. For young people at the start of their working lives, not being in an office will probably entail two kinds of disadvantage: being cut adrift from the collective workplace experiences that allow people to find their professional feet, and not having the domestic space to do your job effectively. There is, needless to say, clear evidence of how traditional gender roles affect home working: in American research done by the <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/covid-19-and-the-employee-experience-how-leaders-can-seize-the-moment" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">management consultants McKinsey</a>, 79% of men said they experienced “positive work effectiveness” at home, compared with only 37% of women. Whoever you are, moreover, there is a good chance that WFH will have <a href="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/you-re-right-you-are-working-longer-and-attending-more-meetings" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">increased your hours</a>: research during the first global lockdown found that for 3 million remote workers around the world, the average working day had increased by 8.2%, or nearly 50 minutes.The American writers Charlie Warzel and Anne Helen Petersen recently published <a href="https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-593-32009-9" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">Out of Office</a>, an exhaustive but very readable book about the upsides and drawbacks of working from home. Its central contention, partly based on their experience of leaving behind office jobs in New York and attempting a new life in Montana, is that working remotely can “remove you from the wheel of constant productivity”, as well as turning you into “a better friend and partner”. The big problem, as they see it, is that far too many employers have quickly built a model of home working on workplace cultures that emphasise long hours, the kind of camaraderie that quickly turns painful, and close monitoring of what people do. They cite the comedian <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinFarzad/status/1196483462934351872?s=20" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">Kevin Farzad’s observation</a> that “if an employer ever says, ‘we’re like family here’ what they mean is they’re going to ruin you psychologically”. Allow those attitudes into people’s domestic environment, and you risk “the total collapse of work-life balance”.To understand that point, forget any visions of high-powered people flitting between the city and country and hosting Zoom meetings in their summerhouses. Instead, think about call-centre work, which was being <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/meet-the-customer-service-reps-for-disney-and-airbnb-who-have-to-pay-to-talk-to-you" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">pushed into people’s homes</a> long before the pandemic. Here, you see not just the connections to be drawn between home working and bogus self-employment, but a new world of remote worker surveillance. In March last year, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/26/teleperformance-call-centre-staff-monitored-via-webcam-home-working-infractions" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">the Guardian reported</a> on the multinational call centre company Teleperformance, and software built around webcams in home-workers’ laptops. “If the system detects no keyboard stroke and mouse click, it will show you as idle for that particular duration, and it will be reported to your supervisor,” said one set of instructions.“If you don’t talk about power in the workplace, you’re not going to get this right,” says Andrew Pakes, a deputy general secretary of the white-collar union Prospect. From this basic point, everything follows. We fixate on home working, when we really should begin with flexibility: irrespective of where they work, the chance for people to start and finish at times of their choosing, carve out free time and ensure holidays complement the other aspects of their lives. Companies ought to pay much more attention to the needs of new recruits – pairing them with dedicated mentors, ensuring they have the option of spending all or most of their working hours in a workplace, allowing them to join a trade union. For all employees, there ought to be both an entitlement to collective representation, and the kind of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/aug/15/uk-workers-need-right-to-disconnect-amid-overtime-epidemic-says-report" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">right to disconnect</a> – to not have to deal with emails, calls and messages outside working hours – <a href="https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2021/august/19/the-right-to-disconnect" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">that has been adopted</a> in France, Italy and Spain, and <a href="https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/scottish-government-airs-support-for-right-to-disconnect/" data-link-name="in body link" dir="ltr">is now tentatively supported </a>– for public sector staff at least – by the SNP-led government in Edinburgh.Somewhere in all that might be the beginnings of home and hybrid working that could actually improve people’s lives. The danger of the weary, punch-drunk mood of early 2022 is that indifference and fatalism will set in, and we will end up sleepwalking into a post-pandemic reality that no one wants. Amid grief, disruption and huge changes to our everyday experiences, the future has arrived: not just of work, but all the other aspects of life that it touches. When do we start doing something about it?<UL><LI>John Harris is a Guardian columnist</LI></UL>An erosion of democratic norms. An escalating climate emergency. Corrosive racial inequality. A crackdown on the right to vote. Rampant pay inequality. America is in the fight of its life. For 10 years, the Guardian US has brought an international lens with a focus on justice to its coverage of America. Globally, more than 1.5 million readers, from 180 countries, have recently taken the step to support the Guardian financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. We couldn’t do this without readers like you. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence, offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour. It is reader support that makes our high-impact journalism possible and gives us the energy to keep doing journalism that matters.Unlike many others, Guardian journalism is available for everyone to read, regardless of what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in information equality.We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical events shaping our world. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – it only takes a minute. Thank you.<div>Single</div><div>Monthly</div><div>Annual</div>

More flexibility could bring long-term benefits, says Guardian columnist John Harris

remotework

Remote Work

career

Career

corporateculture

Corporate Culture

I t was Omicron that did it. Up until early December, office workers in England seemed to be steadily returning to their desks. But once the new variant had arrived, a change that had been taking shape since the Covid crisis started suddenly felt irresistible. Back-to-the-office schedules <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/17/us-omicron-return-to-office-plans-employers">were binned </a>, more companies announced long-term plans for so-called hybrid employment split between homes and workplaces, and there it was: a quiet revolution, whose consequences will unfold over the next year and beyond.

Home and hybrid working has been embraced by a <a href="https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/companies-switching-remote-work-long-term/">long list </a>of tech companies that includes Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Spotify and dozens more. Something similar seems to be happening in the financial sector. In the UK, <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8c231f78-82c4-4028-91c4-e091b8c4a3f9">18m sq ft </a>of office space has been vacated since the start of the pandemic. In the past year, in such places as Derby, Southampton and the London borough of Brent around 20% of offices have been taken out of use, and there are projections that between now and 2027, one in 10 British offices will no longer be needed.

For all the government’s wishful thinking about a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/09/nadhim-zahawi-denies-there-is-plan-to-end-free-lateral-flow-covid-tests">looming return </a>to pre-Covid normality, this looks like deep, era-defining change. Talk to people in trade unions, and you get a sense of a new frontier that demands urgent and careful attention. At the union Unite, for example, they are working on a <a href="https://www.unitetheunion.org/news-events/news/2021/august/unite-vows-to-protect-homeworkers-from-attacks-on-their-pay-and-conditions/">detailed template </a>for home working agreements, designed to minimise the risk of isolation, “stress and depression” and “health and safety risks from working in an unsuitable environment”. So far, though, any political debate about what is happening has reduced everything to yet another instalment of the culture wars. The <a href="https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-mp-jake-berry-ridiculed-25134111">right seems to see </a>any move away from the traditional workplace as a <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1474300/duncan-smith-iain-redundancies-working-from-home-economy-uk-jobs-loss-latest-news-vn">mortal threat </a>to both the economy and our moral wellbeing, while more <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/opinion/remote-work-from-home-office.html">liberal voices </a>glimpse something almost utopian: liberation from the daily commute, increased productivity, more family time. What both sides tend to ignore are massive issues about inequality, what work actually involves, and the way that big companies too often try to offload responsibility and risk on to fragile individuals.

For a start, only a minority of us are actually able to work from home (WFH). In April 2020, the Office for National Statistics put the figure <a href="https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/coronavirusandhomeworkingintheuk/april2020">at 46% </a>, although the number varied wildly across the UK: 57% of Londoners said they were able to do at least some work at home, whereas the figure in the West Midlands was 35%. In that context, even if home working ushers some of those who do it into an idyll of autonomy and holistic living, it threatens to make the class divisions that the pandemic widened both permanent and huge.

Other questions centre on the people who now do at least some of their work not far from where they sleep. If you live alone, WFH may well represent both a degree of freedom and a snatching-away of human interaction. For young people at the start of their working lives, not being in an office will probably entail two kinds of disadvantage: being cut adrift from the collective workplace experiences that allow people to find their professional feet, and not having the domestic space to do your job effectively. There is, needless to say, clear evidence of how traditional gender roles affect home working: in American research done by the <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/covid-19-and-the-employee-experience-how-leaders-can-seize-the-moment">management consultants McKinsey </a>, 79% of men said they experienced “positive work effectiveness” at home, compared with only 37% of women. Whoever you are, moreover, there is a good chance that WFH will have <a href="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/you-re-right-you-are-working-longer-and-attending-more-meetings">increased your hours </a>: research during the first global lockdown found that for 3 million remote workers around the world, the average working day had increased by 8.2%, or nearly 50 minutes.

The American writers Charlie Warzel and Anne Helen Petersen recently published <a href="https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-593-32009-9">Out of Office </a>, an exhaustive but very readable book about the upsides and drawbacks of working from home. Its central contention, partly based on their experience of leaving behind office jobs in New York and attempting a new life in Montana, is that working remotely can “remove you from the wheel of constant productivity”, as well as turning you into “a better friend and partner”. The big problem, as they see it, is that far too many employers have quickly built a model of home working on workplace cultures that emphasise long hours, the kind of camaraderie that quickly turns painful, and close monitoring of what people do. They cite the comedian <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinFarzad/status/1196483462934351872?s=20">Kevin Farzad’s observation </a>that “if an employer ever says, ‘we’re like family here’ what they mean is they’re going to ruin you psychologically”. Allow those attitudes into people’s domestic environment, and you risk “the total collapse of work-life balance”.

To understand that point, forget any visions of high-powered people flitting between the city and country and hosting Zoom meetings in their summerhouses. Instead, think about call-centre work, which was being <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/meet-the-customer-service-reps-for-disney-and-airbnb-who-have-to-pay-to-talk-to-you">pushed into people’s homes </a>long before the pandemic. Here, you see not just the connections to be drawn between home working and bogus self-employment, but a new world of remote worker surveillance. In March last year, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/26/teleperformance-call-centre-staff-monitored-via-webcam-home-working-infractions">the Guardian reported </a>on the multinational call centre company Teleperformance, and software built around webcams in home-workers’ laptops. “If the system detects no keyboard stroke and mouse click, it will show you as idle for that particular duration, and it will be reported to your supervisor,” said one set of instructions.

“If you don’t talk about power in the workplace, you’re not going to get this right,” says Andrew Pakes, a deputy general secretary of the white-collar union Prospect. From this basic point, everything follows. We fixate on home working, when we really should begin with flexibility: irrespective of where they work, the chance for people to start and finish at times of their choosing, carve out free time and ensure holidays complement the other aspects of their lives. Companies ought to pay much more attention to the needs of new recruits – pairing them with dedicated mentors, ensuring they have the option of spending all or most of their working hours in a workplace, allowing them to join a trade union. For all employees, there ought to be both an entitlement to collective representation, and the kind of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/aug/15/uk-workers-need-right-to-disconnect-amid-overtime-epidemic-says-report">right to disconnect </a>– to not have to deal with emails, calls and messages outside working hours – <a href="https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2021/august/19/the-right-to-disconnect">that has been adopted </a>in France, Italy and Spain, and <a href="https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/scottish-government-airs-support-for-right-to-disconnect/">is now tentatively supported </a>– for public sector staff at least – by the SNP-led government in Edinburgh.

Somewhere in all that might be the beginnings of home and hybrid working that could actually improve people’s lives. The danger of the weary, punch-drunk mood of early 2022 is that indifference and fatalism will set in, and we will end up sleepwalking into a post-pandemic reality that no one wants. Amid grief, disruption and huge changes to our everyday experiences, the future has arrived: not just of work, but all the other aspects of life that it touches. When do we start doing something about it?

<ul><li>John Harris is a Guardian columnist </li> </ul>

An erosion of democratic norms. An escalating climate emergency. Corrosive racial inequality. A crackdown on the right to vote. Rampant pay inequality. America is in the fight of its life.

For 10 years, the Guardian US has brought an international lens with a focus on justice to its coverage of America. Globally, more than 1.5 million readers, from 180 countries, have recently taken the step to support the Guardian financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. We couldn’t do this without readers like you.

With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence, offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour. It is reader support that makes our high-impact journalism possible and gives us the energy to keep doing journalism that matters.

Unlike many others, Guardian journalism is available for everyone to read, regardless of what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in information equality.

We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical events shaping our world. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.

Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Working from home has entrenched inequality – how can we use it to improve lives instead? | John Harris

Home and hybrid working

Work from home drawbacks

Improving people's lives

CURATED BY

Related collections

More like this