We all make decisions. However, few of us realize that the process we use to make decisions is more important than the analysis we put into the decision.
A McKinsey Quarterly survey pointed out that 60 percent of executives thought that bad decisions were as frequent as good decisions.

The quality of our decisions

When it comes to decisions, organizations rely on gathering data and analyzing the decision. People believe that analysis reduces biases, but most business decisions made this way turned out to be poor decisions.
Research shows that good analysis from managers who have good judgment won't necessarily produce good decisions.

Analysis doesn't always lead to good decisions

Analysis alone does not yield good decisions as the people who put it together have a subconscious bias and interest in a particular outcome.
Instead, a disciplined decision process involves guarding against decision-making biases by exploring and discussing major uncertainties or discussing contradictory viewpoints.

Process over analysis in decision making

productivity

Productivity

personaldevelopment

Personal Development

problemsolving

Problem Solving

entertainment

Entertainment

<ul><li><a href="/blog/">Articles </a> </li><li><a href="/books/">Books </a> </li><li><a href="/newsletter/">Newsletter </a> </li><li><a href="/knowledge-project/">Podcast </a> </li><li><a href="/membership">Community </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/?memberful_endpoint=auth">Member Login </a> </li><li><a href="/search"> </a> </li> </ul>

<ul><li><a href="/blog/">Articles </a> </li><li><a href="/books/">Books </a> </li><li><a href="/newsletter/">Newsletter </a> </li><li><a href="/knowledge-project/">Podcast </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/members/">Member Login </a> </li><li><a href="/search">Search </a> </li> </ul>

<ul><li><a href="/mental-models/">Mental Models </a> </li><li><a href="/smart-decisions/">Decision Making </a> </li><li><a href="/reading/">Reading Better </a> </li><li><a href="/best-articles/">Best Articles </a> </li><li><a href="/random-articles">Random Article </a> </li><li><a href="/tags/">Tags </a> </li> </ul>

What Matters More in Decisions: Analysis or Process?

We all make decisions. Some of them are large and many of them are small. Few of us understand that the process we use to make those decisions is more important than the analysis we put into the decision.

Think of the last major decision you made.

Maybe it was an acquisition, a large purchase, or perhaps it was whether to launch a new product.

Odds are three things went into that decision: (1) It probably relied on the insights of a few key executives; (2) it involved some sort of fact gathering and analysis; and (3) it was likely enveloped in some sort of decision process—whether formal or informal—that translated the analysis into a decision.

Now how would you rate the quality of your organization’s strategic decisions?

If you’re like most executives, the answer wouldn’t be positive:

In a recent McKinsey Quarterly survey of 2,207 executives, only 28 percent said that the quality of strategic decisions in their companies was generally good, 60 percent thought that bad decisions were about as frequent as good ones, and the remaining 12 percent thought good decisions were altogether infrequent.

How could it be otherwise? Product launches are frequently behind schedule and over budget. Strategic plans often ignore even the anticipated response of competitors. Mergers routinely fail to live up to the promises made in press releases.

The persistence of problems across time and organizations, both large and small, indicates that we can <a href="https://www.fs.blog/smart-decisions/">make better decisions </a>.

“I have no use whatsoever for projections or forecasts. They create an illusion of apparent precision. The more meticulous they are, the more concerned you should be. We never look at projections.”

The best place to start if we’re trying to improve the quality of our decisions is to look at how organizations make decisions. One interesting thing about bureaucracies is that they develop processes to limit the damage the worst people can do at every level. That is they come up with mechanisms to reduce the impact the worst people can have. Yes, this also limits the positive impact that people can have as well. When it comes to decisions, organizations default to gathering data and analyzing decisions.

The widespread belief is that analysis reduces biases. But does it?

Is putting your faith in analysis any better than using your gut? What does the evidence say? Is there a better way?

Dan Lovallo and Olivier Sibony <a href="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_case_for_behavioral_strategy_2551">set to find out </a>.

Lovallo is a professor at the University of Sydney and Olivier is a director at McKinsey &amp; Company. Together they studied 1,048 “major” business decisions over five years. The results are surprising.

Most business decisions were not made on “gut calls” but rather rigorous analysis. And yet they were poor decisions. In short, most people did the all the legwork we think we’re supposed to do: they delivered large quantities of detailed analysis.

Yet this wasn’t enough. “Our research indicates that, contrary to what one might assume, good analysis in the hands of managers who have good judgment won’t naturally yield good decisions. ”

[Projections] are put together by people who have an interest in a particular outcome, have a subconscious bias, and its apparent precision makes it fallacious. They remind me of Mark Twain’s saying, ‘A mine is a hole in the ground owned by a liar.’ Projections in America are often a lie, although not an intentional one, but the worst kind because the forecaster often believes them himself.”

Lovallo and Sibony didn’t only look at the analysis, they also asked executives about the process used to make decisions.

Did they, for example, “explicitly explore and discuss major uncertainties or discuss viewpoints that contradicted the senior leader’s? ”

So what matters more, process or analysis? After comparing the results they determined that “process mattered more than analysis—by a factor of six. ”

This finding does not mean that analysis is unimportant, as a closer look at the data reveals: almost no decisions in our sample made through a very strong process were backed by very poor analysis. Why? Because one of the things an unbiased decision-making process will do is ferret out poor analysis. The reverse is not true; superb analysis is useless unless the decision process gives it a fair hearing.

To illustrate the weakness of how most organizations make decisions, Sibony <a href="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/How_CFOs_can_keep_strategic_decisions_on_track_2750">used </a>an interesting analogy: the legal system.

Imagine walking into a courtroom where the trial consists of a prosecutor presenting PowerPoint slides. In 20 pretty compelling charts, he demonstrates why the defendant is guilty. The judge then challenges some of the facts of the presentation, but the prosecutor has a good answer to every objection. So the judge decides, and the accused man is sentenced.

That wouldn’t be due process, right? So if you would find this process shocking in a courtroom, why is it acceptable when you make an investment decision? Now of course, this is an oversimplification, but this process is essentially the one most companies follow to make a decision. They have a team arguing only one side of the case. The team has a choice of what points it wants to make and what way it wants to make them. And it falls to the final decision maker to be both the challenger and the ultimate judge. Building a good decision-making process is largely ensuring that these flaws don’t happen.

Simply understanding our cognitive biases doesn’t make you immune to them. It’s not enough. A disciplined decision process is the best place to improve the quality of decisions and guard against common decision-making biases.

Still curious? Read <a href="https://www.fs.blog/smart-decisions/">the ultimate guide to making smart decisions </a>.

<ul><li>1 The inspiration for this post comes from Chip and Dan Heath in Decisive. </li> </ul>

The growing influence of algorithms on our lives means we owe it to ourselves to better understand what they are and how they work. Understanding how the data we use to inform algorithms influences the results they give can help us avoid biases and make better decisions. *** Algorithms are everywhere: driving our cars, designing […]

Why We Focus on Trivial Things: The Bikeshed Effect

Bikeshedding is a metaphor to illustrate the strange tendency we have to spend excessive time on trivial matters, often glossing over important ones. Here’s why we do it, and how to stop. *** How can we stop wasting time on unimportant details? From meetings at work that drag on forever without achieving anything to weeks-long […]

Preserving Optionality: Preparing for the Unknown

We’re often advised to excel at one thing. But as the future gets harder to predict, preserving optionality allows us to pivot when the road ahead crumbles. *** How do we prepare for a world that often changes drastically and rapidly? We can preserve our optionality. We don’t often get the advice to keep our […]

<ul><li><a href="/newsletter/">Newsletter </a> </li><li><a href="/knowledge-project/">Podcast </a> </li><li><a href="/membership">Learning Community </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/books/">Books </a> </li><li><a href="/speaking">Speaking </a> </li><li><a href="/about">About </a> </li> </ul>

<ul><li><a href="/mental-models/">Mental Models </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/learning">Learning </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/reading/">Reading </a> </li><li><a href="/smart-decisions/">Decision Making </a> </li><li><a href="https://fs.blog/intellectual-giants/">Intellectual Giants </a> </li> </ul>

<ul><li><a href="/sponsorship">Sponsorship </a> </li><li><a href="https://rethinkworkshops.com/">Workshops </a> </li> </ul>

Hosted by <a href="https://pressable.com/">Pressable </a>. See our <a href="https://www.fs.blog/privacy-policy/">Privacy Policy. </a> Farnam Street participates in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising commissions by linking to Amazon.

We're <a href="https://syruspartners.com/">Syrus Partners </a>. We buy amazing businesses.

What Matters More in Decisions: Analysis or Process?

The quality of our decisions

Analysis doesn't always lead to good decisions

Process over analysis in decision making

Rebecca L.'s ideas are part of this journey:

Related collections

Similar ideas