A study found that people are more willing to donate when a charity appeals to the benefits the donors will receive than to altruism.
Researchers mailed postcards encouraging randomly assigned families to donate money to charity. The postcard either highlighted the benefits to others or the benefits to themselves. Those who received the postcard promoting self-benefits were 6.6 percent more likely to give and gave 23 percent more on average.

Charities to appeal to self-interest of donors

The study to increase donations above current levels does not deny that some people are giving out of altruism, but rather that an appeal to self-interest is effective.
In an ideal world, charity is its own reward. In this world, it helps to remind people that they can feel wonderful after donating to a cause.

Not all actions are driven by self-interest

<div dir="ltr">
 <h2 data-type="text" dir="ltr">A study on charity finds that reminding people how nice it feels to give yields better results than appealing to altruism.</h2>
</div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">
 
 </div></div>16 April, 2021</div><img alt="Study: People will donate more to charity if they think something’s in it for them" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNjA1NzQ1OS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2NTAzMjg4N30.Ge1RnKZI899wVxCGsvrxo9zWIXM7WZ2nrrU08lQFgKs/img.jpg?width=1245&amp;quality=85&amp;coordinates=0%2C260%2C0%2C260&amp;height=700" width="703" height="396"><UL><LI>A study finds asking for donations by appealing to the donor's self-interest may result in more money than appealing to their better nature. </LI><LI>Those who received an appeal to self-interest were both more likely to give and gave more than those in the control group. </LI><LI>The effect was most pronounced for those who hadn't given before.</LI></UL>Even the best charities with the longest records of doing great fundraising work have to spend some time making sure that the next donation checks will keep coming in. One way to do this is by showing potential donors all the good things the charity did over the previous year. But there may be a better way.A new study by researchers in the United States and Australia suggests that appealing to the benefits people will receive themselves after a donation nudges them to donate more money than appealing to the greater good.<h2>How to get people to give away free money</h2><img src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20801%20451'%3E%3C/svg%3E" width="623" height="351">The postcards that were sent to different study subjects. The one on the left highlighted benefits to the self, while the one on the right highlighted benefits to others.List et al. / Nature Human Behaviour The <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01095-8" rel="noopener noreferrer" dir="ltr">study</a>, published in Nature Human Behaviour, utilized the <a href="https://www.pickclickgive.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" dir="ltr">Pick.Click.Give</a> program in Alaska. This program allows Alaska residents who qualify for dividends from the Alaska Permanent Fund, a yearly payment ranging from $800 to $2000 in recent years, to donate a portion of it to various in-state non-profit organizations.The researchers randomly assigned households to either a control group or to receive a postcard in the mail encouraging them to donate a portion of their dividend to charity. That postcard could come in one of two forms, either highlighting the benefits to others or the benefits to themselves.Those who got the postcard touting self-benefits were 6.6 percent more likely to give than those in the control group and gave 23 percent more on average. Those getting the benefits-to-others postcard were slightly more likely to give than those receiving no postcard, but their donations were no larger.Additionally, the researchers were able to break the subject list down into a "warm list" of those who had given at least once before in the last two years and a "cold list" of those who had not. Those on the warm list, who were already giving, saw only minor increases in their likelihood to donate after getting a postcard in the mail compared to those on the cold list. Additionally, the researchers found that warm-list subjects who received the self-interest postcard gave 11 percent more than warm-list subjects in the control group. Amazingly, among cold-list subjects, those who received a self-interest postcard gave 39 percent more.These are substantial improvements. At the end of the study, the authors point out, "If we had sent the benefits to self message to all households in the state, aggregate contributions would have increased by nearly US$600,000."To put this into perspective, in 2017 the <a href="https://www.pickclickgive.org/about-pick-click-give/" rel="noopener noreferrer" dir="ltr">total donations</a> to the program were roughly $2,700,000.<h2>Is altruism dead?</h2><div class="embed-placeholder" data-type="youtube" data-id="xn8o3h-B4vU"></div>Are all actions inherently self-interested? Thankfully, no. The study focuses entirely on effective ways to increase charitable donations above levels that currently exist. It doesn't deny that some people are giving out of pure altruism, but rather that an appeal based on self-interest is effective. Plenty of people were giving before this study took place who didn't need a postcard as encouragement. It is also possible that some people donated part of their dividend check to a charity that does not work with Pick.Click.Give and were uncounted here. It is also important to note that Pick.Click.Give does not provide services but instead gives money to a wide variety of organizations that do. Those organizations operate in fields from animal rescue to job training to public broadcasting. The authors note that it is possible that a more specific appeal to the benefits others will receive from a donation might prove more effective than the generic and all-inclusive "Make Alaska Better For Everyone" appeal that they used.In an ideal world, charity is its own reward. In ours, it might help to remind somebody how <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warm-glow_giving" rel="noopener noreferrer" dir="ltr">warm and fuzzy</a> they'll feel after donating to your cause.

A study on charity finds that reminding people how nice it feels to give yields better results than appealing to altruism

Understand yourself and those around you.

psychology

Psychology

personaldevelopment

Personal Development

moneyandinvestments

Money & Investments

communication

Communication

teamwork

Teamwork

A study on charity finds that reminding people how nice it feels to give yields better results than appealing to altruism.

<ul><li>A study finds asking for donations by appealing to the donor's self-interest may result in more money than appealing to their better nature. </li><li>Those who received an appeal to self-interest were both more likely to give and gave more than those in the control group. </li><li>The effect was most pronounced for those who hadn't given before. </li> </ul>

Even the best charities with the longest records of doing great fundraising work have to spend some time making sure that the next donation checks will keep coming in. One way to do this is by showing potential donors all the good things the charity did over the previous year. But there may be a better way.

A new study by researchers in the United States and Australia suggests that appealing to the benefits people will receive themselves after a donation nudges them to donate more money than appealing to the greater good.

How to get people to give away free money

The postcards that were sent to different study subjects. The one on the left highlighted benefits to the self, while the one on the right highlighted benefits to others.

List et al. / Nature Human Behaviour

The <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01095-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">study </a>, published in Nature Human Behaviour , utilized the <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.pickclickgive.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pick.Click.Give </a>program in Alaska. This program allows Alaska residents who qualify for dividends from the Alaska Permanent Fund, a yearly payment ranging from $800 to $2000 in recent years, to donate a portion of it to various in-state non-profit organizations.

The researchers randomly assigned households to either a control group or to receive a postcard in the mail encouraging them to donate a portion of their dividend to charity. That postcard could come in one of two forms, either highlighting the benefits to others or the benefits to themselves.

Those who got the postcard touting self-benefits were 6.6 percent more likely to give than those in the control group and gave 23 percent more on average. Those getting the benefits-to-others postcard were slightly more likely to give than those receiving no postcard, but their donations were no larger.

Additionally, the researchers were able to break the subject list down into a "warm list" of those who had given at least once before in the last two years and a "cold list" of those who had not. Those on the warm list, who were already giving, saw only minor increases in their likelihood to donate after getting a postcard in the mail compared to those on the cold list.

Additionally, the researchers found that warm-list subjects who received the self-interest postcard gave 11 percent more than warm-list subjects in the control group. Amazingly, among cold-list subjects, those who received a self-interest postcard gave 39 percent more.

These are substantial improvements. At the end of the study, the authors point out, "If we had sent the benefits to self message to all households in the state, aggregate contributions would have increased by nearly US$600,000."

To put this into perspective, in 2017 the <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.pickclickgive.org/about-pick-click-give/" rel="noopener noreferrer">total donations </a>to the program were roughly $2,700,000.

Are all actions inherently self-interested? Thankfully, no. The study focuses entirely on effective ways to increase charitable donations above levels that currently exist. It doesn't deny that some people are giving out of pure altruism, but rather that an appeal based on self-interest is effective. Plenty of people were giving before this study took place who didn't need a postcard as encouragement. It is also possible that some people donated part of their dividend check to a charity that does not work with Pick.Click.Give and were uncounted here.

It is also important to note that Pick.Click.Give does not provide services but instead gives money to a wide variety of organizations that do. Those organizations operate in fields from animal rescue to job training to public broadcasting. The authors note that it is possible that a more specific appeal to the benefits others will receive from a donation might prove more effective than the generic and all-inclusive "Make Alaska Better For Everyone" appeal that they used.

In an ideal world, charity is its own reward. In ours, it might help to remind somebody how <a dir="ltr" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warm-glow_giving" rel="noopener noreferrer">warm and fuzzy </a>they'll feel after donating to your cause.

Study: People will donate more to charity if they think something’s in it for them

Charities to appeal to self-interest of donors

Not all actions are driven by self-interest

Aniyah J.'s ideas are part of this journey:

Related collections

Similar ideas