Your one stop book summary, audiobook and book review spot for:
Range Summary
About Range Book
The #1 New York Times bestseller that has all America talking—with a new afterword on expanding your range—as seen on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS, Morning Joe, CBS This Morning, and more.
“The most important business—and parenting—book of the year.” —Forbes
“Urgent and important. . . an essential read for bosses, parents, coaches, and anyone who cares about improving performance.” —Daniel H. Pink
Shortlisted for the Financial Times/McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award
Plenty of experts argue that anyone who wants to develop a skill, play an instrument, or lead their field should start early, focus intensely, and rack up as many hours of deliberate practice as possible. If you dabble or delay, you’ll never catch up to the people who got a head start. But a closer look at research on the world’s top performers, from professional athletes to Nobel laureates, shows that early specialization is the exception, not the rule.
David Epstein examined the world’s most successful athletes, artists, musicians, inventors, forecasters and scientists. He discovered that in most fields—especially those that are complex and unpredictable—generalists, not specialists, are primed to excel. Generalists often find their path late, and they juggle many interests rather than focusing on one. They’re also more creative, more agile, and able to make connections their more specialized peers can’t see.
Provocative, rigorous, and engrossing, Range makes a compelling case for actively cultivating inefficiency. Failing a test is the best way to learn. Frequent quitters end up with the most fulfilling careers. The most impactful inventors cross domains rather than deepening their knowledge in a single area. As experts silo themselves further while computers master more of the skills once reserved for highly focused humans, people who think broadly and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives will increasingly thrive.
See More
4.4/5 (4507 reviews)
Audio and text
Download free PDF
‘Kind’ vs ‘wicked’ learning environments
Learning environments can be split into two:
- The kind ones, where patterns repeat and specialists get better with experiences, such as in chess.
- The wicked ones, where there is a lot of spontaneity and unpredictability involved and experience doesn’t necessarily correlate with success, such as when researching.
1.87K
Cognitive entrenchment and abstract thinking
Modern work demands knowledge transfer and abstract thinking, things which are not being actively taught in our highly-specialized academic curriculums.
It’s harder to be creative in a field the longer you have been studying it. It is best to insist on ’having one foot outside your world', to try to have broad interests and not focus on solely one thing in your learning path.
2.01K
Breadth of training predicts breadth of transfer
Children who try their hand at playing multiple instruments have a higher chance of becoming elites in one (even if they specialize later in life) than those who have been presented with a particular instrument from a very early age.
The figlie of the Ospedale della Pietà in Venice are good example of that.
1.81K
Generalist Vs Spesialist
There are two kind of people in this world.
First is a generalist, who knows different & many things but not in depth.
And the second one is a specialist, who excels in particular field of knowledge in depth. But not adequate in any other field besides it.
142
Ordered Vs Wicked Environment
Ordered environment is an environment with a stable, repetitive, and controlled situation in which we can predict what could be happen inside it. Specialist people tend to have a benefit from this kind of environment. Example : Chess game & computer programming
Wicked Environment is an environment with a chaotic, unstable, and unpredictable outcome. Specialization tend to perform bad in this environment and the generalist have an advantage in this kind of environment. Example : Stock Market & Political Science
122
Generalist Vs Spesialist
Generalist and Spesialist doesn't always contradict each other.
Rather, the world need both of them to make innovation and progress in different fields of study
105
Survive in fast changing world
Tiger Woods vs Roger Federer
Tiger Woods
- Started Training when 2 yrs old
- Deliberated practice since child
- Became prodigy in teens
- GOAT in Golfing
Roger Federer
- Played different sports till 10 yrs old
- Developed overall physical proficiency
- Became star player in his twenties
- GOAT in tennis
What does world needs, more Woods or more Federer?
10
Generalist vs Specialist
Debate of generalist vs specialist is very old. In some areas, generalist prevails and in some specialist thrives.
11
Where Specialist Survives?
Specialist thrives in areas where:-
- experience generates expertise in the field
- pattern are repetitive, and pattern recognition is primary
- focus is the key component
- during learning feedback to any action is fast and accurate.
- situations are less dynamic and
- less no. of variable came in play
Eg of such areas are surgeon, chess player, golf etc
16
Breadth In Knowledge
Psychologist and prominent creativity researcher Dean Keith Simonton observed, "rather than obsessively focusing on a narrow topic, creative achievers tend to have broad interests. This breadth often supports insights that cannot be attributed to domain specific expertise alone."
27
Learn And Apply
The successful adapters were excellent at taking knowledge from one pursuit and applying it creatively to another, and at avoiding cognitive entrenchment.
In the wicked world with ill-defined challenges and few rigid rules, range can be a life hack
29
Hypercorrection Effect
The more confident a learner is of their wrong answer, the better the information sticks when they subsequently learn the right answer. Tolerating big mistakes can create the best learning opportunities
37
The importance of generalists in the 4th Industrial Revolution.
Why Generalists Will Flourish?
The inspiring from this book is about why generalists will flourish.
’Kind vs ‘wicked’ learning environments
Learning environments can be split into two:
- The kind one, where patterns repeat and specialists get better with experiences, such as in chess.
- The wicked ones, where there is a lot of spontaneity and unpredictability involved and experience doesn’t necessarily correlate with success, such as when researching.
15
Cognitive entrenchment and abstract thinking
Modern work demands knowledge transfer and abstract thinking, things which are not being actively taught in our highly - specialized academic curriculums.
It’s harder to be creative in a field the longer you have been studying it. It is best to insist on ‘having one foot outside your world’, to try to have broad interests and not focus on solely one thing in your learning path.
18
Breadth Of Training Predicts Breadth Of Transfer
Children who try their hand at playing multiple instruments have a higher chance of becoming elites in one (even if they specialize later in life) than those who have been presented with a particular instrument from a very early age.
The figlie of the Ospedale Della Pieta in Venice are good example of that
16
Psychologist Gary Klein is a pioneer of the “naturalistic decision making” (NDM) model of expertise; NDM researchers observe expert performers in their natural course of work to learn how they make high-stakes decisions under time pressure. Klein has shown that experts in an array of fields are remarkably similar to chess masters in that they instinctively recognize familiar patterns.
DAVID J. EPSTEIN
1
One of Klein’s colleagues, psychologist Daniel Kahneman, studied human decision making from the “heuristics and biases” model of human judgment. His findings could hardly have been more different from Klein’s. When Kahneman probed the judgments of highly trained experts, he often found that experience had not helped at all. Even worse, it frequently bred confidence but not skill.
DAVID J. EPSTEIN
1
an influential book on expert judgment was published that Kahneman told me impressed him “enormously.” It was a wide-ranging review of research that rocked psychology because it showed experience simply did not create skill in a wide range of real-world scenarios, from college administrators assessing student potential to psychiatrists predicting patient performance to human resources professionals deciding who will succeed in job training. In those domains, which involved human behavior and where patterns did not clearly repeat, repetition did not cause learning. Chess, golf, and firefighting are exceptions, not the rule.
DAVID J. EPSTEIN
1
Generalists vs Specialists
- Generalists have a wide range of experiences which make them capable of navigating through unique uncertain situations involving a lot of variables.
- Specialists have an excellent grip on their subject matter which makes them a valuable asset in building fool proof and quality systems.
- As a firm believer of the power of collaboration, a team requires both types of people : Generalists to provide the bigger picture, Specialists for building excellent individual systems aligned to the vision.
16
Speed is not important
Learning itself is best done slowly to accumulate lasting knowledge.
5
Experience frequently breeds confidence but not skill
5
Story of Vincent van Gogh
- Career switcher, tried and perfected multiple professions only to realise he doen not enjoy working on them
- Got hung up with paiting at age 29, 4 years before he died
2
Depth of knowledge must be accompanied by breadth of experience.
4
Supercharge your mind with one idea per day
Enter your email and spend 1 minute every day to learn something new.
I agree to receive email updates