The great work-from-home experiment has surfaced both good and bad effects.
<ul>
<li>Working from home during the(still ongoing) pandemic has been an extraordinary experience, where almost overnight, we started handling our job, kids, home and everything else without any real support or warning.</li>
<li>This unique situation was due to a global medical emergency, something we only saw in apocalyptic movies.</li>
<li>When the world re-opens, the equation will change again and working from home could be an individual choice with various pros and cons.</li>
</ul>

Remote Working In A Normal World

<ul><li>Conversations became foreign, exhausting and soulless with Zoom, even as home offices were being set up in the bedroom or the Kitchen table under a stack of books.</li><li>These conditions were forced due to the pandemic, as working from home had become an unavoidable necessity.&nbsp;</li><li>Now that vaccines are here and the pandemic is under control in most areas, companies would want to call their employees to the office.</li></ul>

Kitchen Offices With Zoom Fatigue

The pressure-cooker environment brought in by the pandemic made remote working normal, but now as hybrid working(a mix of remote and non-remote) has started to happen in some companies, people staying at home could feel handicapped or left out, as it is easier to build relations or advance one’s career when physically present in the office.

Hybrid Working Blues

Pre-pandemic, successful remote work required the following:<ol><li dir = "auto">Your working space or home office should be a different room, not where you sleep or eat.</li><li dir = "auto">Have a reliable high-speed broadband connection.</li><li dir = "auto">One should have at least six months of experience in the current job to know what is going on.</li></ol>The pandemic proved that even if one is working from the bedroom with the mobile hotspot connection on the laptop and has just a week of work experience, remote working is still possible.

Breaking The Rules

<ul><li>The great remote work experiment taught everyone that it is possible to do everything remotely.&nbsp;</li><li>Software companies stepped up and offered more for free to ensure that work and education did not suffer.</li><li>Going forward, communication, flexibility and clarification instead of assumption should be the golden rules of remote working.</li></ul>

The Great Remote Work Experiment

<div><a rel="">By Bryan Lufkin</a></div><div>12th August 2021</div><div>We've lived through a global remote-work experiment. But is our assessment of work-from-home flawed since we didn't have a choice?</div>Article continues below<div>S</div>Since the pandemic hit, people around the world have been taking part in a ‘Great Remote Work Experiment’. We’ve learned a lot, about things like productivity, communication and boundaries. We’ve proved we can do get our jobs done, something that has fueled global conversations about work structures once Covid-19 subsides.Yet there’s one thing we keep forgetting. We weren’t just working from home – we were working from home during a pandemic. The experiment began almost overnight, with minimal preparation or support. We worked at our kitchen tables, sometimes watching our children, as we sheltered from a virus. Everyone was in the same boat, working remotely without choice.That means that although we did work from home, our experiences were shaped within a very specific, unique and communal set of circumstances. When the world re-opens, these circumstances will change – meaning that remote work may feel rather different. Some experts suggest we need to reflect on which parts of our ‘experiment’ may have been unrepresentative of long-term remote work in a pandemic-free society. Others suggest that our pandemic ‘experiment’ taught us more about remote work than we could ever have imagined, and propelled work-from-home into the mainstream in a vastly accelerated manner.Both good and bad effects have come from the great work-from-home experiment occurring during a global medical emergency. Experts say pinpointing these could better inform our future work practices.Why the pandemic isn’t the best guideOn one hand, we crash-landed into remote work because of the pandemic. This could mean we’re not best placed to judge how well or poorly it works under ‘normal’ circumstances.“There was this enormous uncertainty – the stress that we all felt of ‘what’s going to happen to society?’,” says Martha Maznevski, professor of organisational behaviour at the University of Western Ontario. The last 18 months have been tough for many of us; some have faced health-related anxiety, loneliness and <a href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210216-how-boredom-can-be-a-force-for-good-or-bad" dir="ltr">boredom</a>, while others have been juggling children and homeschooling with professional responsibilities. And all of us had to rapidly adjust to new ways of working.Workstations, for example, weren’t necessarily standing desks in home offices; they were stacks of books on kitchen tables, or even <a href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210217-is-it-bad-to-you-work-from-your-bed-for-a-year" dir="ltr">our beds</a>. Zoom made conversations – professional or personal – <a href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200421-why-zoom-video-chats-are-so-exhausting" dir="ltr">feel foreign and exhausting</a>, but we couldn’t leave our homes for fear of contracting the virus. It’s fair to assume these factors will have shaped people’s ability to work, and their resultant view of remote work, in diverse ways – and some may never want to work away from the office again.&nbsp;<picture><source media="(min-width:1200px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1600x900/p09rkhpr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:1200px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1600x900/p09rkhpr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:880px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1280x720/p09rkhpr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:880px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1280x720/p09rkhpr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:576px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhpr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:576px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhpr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:224px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/624x351/p09rkhpr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:224px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/624x351/p09rkhpr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><img title="Even 18 months into the pandemic, working from home can still have pitfalls, from poor workstations to a lack of space (Credit: Getty Images)" src="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhpr.jpg" alt="Even 18 months into the pandemic, working from home can still have pitfalls, from poor workstations to a lack of space (Credit: Getty Images)" width="687" height="386"></picture>Even 18 months into the pandemic, working from home can still have pitfalls, from poor workstations to a lack of space (Credit: Getty Images)Not all of these ‘forced’ conditions were bad, however. Because knowledge workers went remote by necessity, regardless of company or industry, everyone was facing the same challenges, and people pulled together to find solutions. Yet this benefit may have been unique to the pandemic; once we return to a world in which people have different working situations, our ways of working will begin to diverge again, and integrating remote work may become more complicated.&nbsp;“The all-remote was fine; now we’re getting into the mix [of remote and non-remote], and that takes a lot more thought,” says Anita Woolley, associate professor of organisational behaviour and theory at Carnegie Mellon University, US. Now, as some firms begin <a href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/hello-hybrid" dir="ltr">hybrid working</a>, employees may soon realise that it’s going to be harder to pull off remote work when some people are at home while others are in the office, where it’s easier to build relationships, collaborate and even <a href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210305-why-in-person-workers-may-be-more-likely-to-get-promoted" dir="ltr">advance in the company</a>.Additionally, the working hours we put in while remote were linked to the fact that we were stuck at home. While there’s data to suggest that <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/90601567/how-covid-19-has-us-doing-more-in-less-time" dir="ltr">we were more productive</a> during the pandemic, and that some companies <a href="https://hbr.org/2020/12/the-pandemic-is-widening-a-corporate-productivity-gap" dir="ltr">were more productive than others</a>, that could be due to <a href="https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/11/24/people-are-working-longer-hours-during-the-pandemic" dir="ltr">people working longer hours each day</a>, <a href="https://hbr.org/2021/02/beyond-burned-out" dir="ltr">to the point of burnout</a>. There were few leisure options available, plus we were worried about our jobs, which meant many people defaulted to working longer hours. We can’t necessarily conclude that widespread remote work makes people more productive, even if we do save time on things like daily commutes.So, does that all mean that we’ve conditioned companies and workers to think of remote work in a certain way that isn’t necessarily indicative of the future? We’ve developed preferences about working from home that might be based on experiences that aren’t necessarily representative of what remote work is supposed to look like – we’re not going to be glued to Zoom during lockdowns forever, after all.It could be that we’re in for a surprise – unpleasant or otherwise – when we experience remote work after the pandemic.<BLOCKQUOTE><h2>The all-remote was fine; now we’re getting into the mix [of remote and non-remote], and that takes a lot more thought - Anita Woolley</h2></BLOCKQUOTE>Don’t pull the alarm yetYet not all experts are concerned about whether our pandemic work-from-home experiences could distort our view of remote work. Some argue that the context in which we worked shouldn’t discount our experiment – if anything, it should help guide how we roll out long-term remote work policies going forward.“In what ways can we use this dataset and generalise from it, and in what ways can we not?” says Maznevski. “Not that we throw it all out – but what parts of it are going to generalise to a non-pandemic situation?”<picture><source media="(min-width:1200px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1600x900/p09rkhwr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:1200px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1600x900/p09rkhwr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:880px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1280x720/p09rkhwr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:880px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/1280x720/p09rkhwr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:576px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhwr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:576px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhwr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><source media="(min-width:224px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/624x351/p09rkhwr.webp" type="image/webp"><source media="(min-width:224px)" srcset="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/624x351/p09rkhwr.jpg" type="image/jpeg"><img title="But despite challenges, some experts say that the pandemic-era remote work experiment was more successful than anyone could have guessed (Credit: Getty Images)" src="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/976x549/p09rkhwr.jpg" alt="But despite challenges, some experts say that the pandemic-era remote work experiment was more successful than anyone could have guessed (Credit: Getty Images)" width="687" height="386"></picture>But despite challenges, some experts say that the pandemic-era remote work experiment was more successful than anyone could have guessed (Credit: Getty Images)Nicholas Bloom, professor of economics at Stanford University in California, points to “three golden rules” that, pre-pandemic, were believed to be crucial for successful remote work. First, having a working space that wasn’t the same room as where you slept; second, having high-speed broadband; third, six or more months of experience on the job so that you knew what you were doing.The pandemic proved all three were, in fact, not required – and if it weren’t for the unique nature of the pandemic, we never would have been able to figure that out, says Bloom. Now, moving forwards, we can look at the difficult remote-work conditions during the pandemic, and use what we’ve learned to improve our set-ups. Bloom says he thinks it’s “incredibly positive” that pandemic remote work has been “more successful than anyone ever predicted”.He suggests that the forced remote-work experiment is like comparing two versions of a smartphone. Say you bought an original smartphone years ago, and thought it was convenient at the time, but then one day you buy the newest, shiniest model, and suddenly realised how much more convenient it is than the original. That’s what remote work after Covid-19 could be like – we’ll only be able to improve and iterate on what was surprisingly successful during the pandemic.Bloom also believes that, without the unique pressure-cooker environment of the pandemic, there wouldn’t have been as many leaps in remote-work technological innovation. He and his colleagues point out in a 2021 working paper that the number of US patent applications for technologies supporting telework, video conferencing and working from home <a href="https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BFI_WP_2020133.pdf" dir="ltr">doubled between January and September 2020</a>. Even “Zoom is a lot better now than a few months ago”, says Bloom.Kevin Johnson, associate professor of management at HEC Montréal business school, says that the pandemic gave remote work a wave it wouldn’t have had otherwise. “We’ve got the momentum to use in the coming months, weeks, to try and build something more integrated in our management system and our leadership styles,” he says.In the end, we can acknowledge both perspectives; that while working remotely during the pandemic distorted many people’s views of what long-term remote work would look like, the unusual ways the pandemic affected the telework experience can serve as learning points for the future.It’s important to identify the pieces of the Great Remote Work Experiment that were unique to the pandemic. After all, we might be tempted to look at those elements, and assume that they’ll always be a part of remote work. That’s why we need to pay attention to the parts of the day-to-day that pan out better or worse than we think, and flag it with a manager early. Communication and flexibility will be key. Just because certain factors helped remote work spread more quickly than it would otherwise, doesn’t mean those factors will stick around forever.

We've lived through a global remote-work experiment. But is our assessment of work-from-home flawed since we didn't have a choice?

Stashed ideas

Since the pandemic hit, people around the world have been taking part in a ‘Great Remote Work Experiment’. We’ve learned a lot, about things like productivity, communication and boundaries. We’ve proved we can do get our jobs done, something that has fueled global conversations about work structures once Covid-19 subsides.

Yet there’s one thing we keep forgetting. We weren’t just working from home – we were working from home during a pandemic. The experiment began almost overnight, with minimal preparation or support. We worked at our kitchen tables, sometimes watching our children, as we sheltered from a virus. Everyone was in the same boat, working remotely without choice.

That means that although we did work from home, our experiences were shaped within a very specific, unique and communal set of circumstances. When the world re-opens, these circumstances will change – meaning that remote work may feel rather different. Some experts suggest we need to reflect on which parts of our ‘experiment’ may have been unrepresentative of long-term remote work in a pandemic-free society. Others suggest that our pandemic ‘experiment’ taught us more about remote work than we could ever have imagined, and propelled work-from-home into the mainstream in a vastly accelerated manner.

Both good and bad effects have come from the great work-from-home experiment occurring during a global medical emergency. Experts say pinpointing these could better inform our future work practices.

Why the pandemic isn’t the best guide

On one hand, we crash-landed into remote work because of the pandemic. This could mean we’re not best placed to judge how well or poorly it works under ‘normal’ circumstances.

“There was this enormous uncertainty – the stress that we all felt of ‘what’s going to happen to society?’,” says Martha Maznevski, professor of organisational behaviour at the University of Western Ontario. The last 18 months have been tough for many of us; some have faced health-related anxiety, loneliness and <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210216-how-boredom-can-be-a-force-for-good-or-bad">boredom </a>, while others have been juggling children and homeschooling with professional responsibilities. And all of us had to rapidly adjust to new ways of working.

Workstations, for example, weren’t necessarily standing desks in home offices; they were stacks of books on kitchen tables, or even <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210217-is-it-bad-to-you-work-from-your-bed-for-a-year">our beds </a>. Zoom made conversations – professional or personal – <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200421-why-zoom-video-chats-are-so-exhausting">feel foreign and exhausting </a>, but we couldn’t leave our homes for fear of contracting the virus. It’s fair to assume these factors will have shaped people’s ability to work, and their resultant view of remote work, in diverse ways – and some may never want to work away from the office again.

Even 18 months into the pandemic, working from home can still have pitfalls, from poor workstations to a lack of space (Credit: Getty Images)

Not all of these ‘forced’ conditions were bad, however. Because knowledge workers went remote by necessity, regardless of company or industry, everyone was facing the same challenges, and people pulled together to find solutions. Yet this benefit may have been unique to the pandemic; once we return to a world in which people have different working situations, our ways of working will begin to diverge again, and integrating remote work may become more complicated.

“The all-remote was fine; now we’re getting into the mix [of remote and non-remote], and that takes a lot more thought,” says Anita Woolley, associate professor of organisational behaviour and theory at Carnegie Mellon University, US. Now, as some firms begin <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/hello-hybrid">hybrid working </a>, employees may soon realise that it’s going to be harder to pull off remote work when some people are at home while others are in the office, where it’s easier to build relationships, collaborate and even <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210305-why-in-person-workers-may-be-more-likely-to-get-promoted">advance in the company </a>.

Additionally, the working hours we put in while remote were linked to the fact that we were stuck at home. While there’s data to suggest that <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.fastcompany.com/90601567/how-covid-19-has-us-doing-more-in-less-time">we were more productive </a>during the pandemic, and that some companies <a dir="ltr" href="https://hbr.org/2020/12/the-pandemic-is-widening-a-corporate-productivity-gap">were more productive than others </a>, that could be due to <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/11/24/people-are-working-longer-hours-during-the-pandemic">people working longer hours each day </a>, <a dir="ltr" href="https://hbr.org/2021/02/beyond-burned-out">to the point of burnout </a>. There were few leisure options available, plus we were worried about our jobs, which meant many people defaulted to working longer hours. We can’t necessarily conclude that widespread remote work makes people more productive, even if we do save time on things like daily commutes.

So, does that all mean that we’ve conditioned companies and workers to think of remote work in a certain way that isn’t necessarily indicative of the future? We’ve developed preferences about working from home that might be based on experiences that aren’t necessarily representative of what remote work is supposed to look like – we’re not going to be glued to Zoom during lockdowns forever, after all.

It could be that we’re in for a surprise – unpleasant or otherwise – when we experience remote work after the pandemic.

The all-remote was fine; now we’re getting into the mix [of remote and non-remote], and that takes a lot more thought - Anita Woolley

Don’t pull the alarm yet

Yet not all experts are concerned about whether our pandemic work-from-home experiences could distort our view of remote work. Some argue that the context in which we worked shouldn’t discount our experiment – if anything, it should help guide how we roll out long-term remote work policies going forward.

“In what ways can we use this dataset and generalise from it, and in what ways can we not?” says Maznevski. “Not that we throw it all out – but what parts of it are going to generalise to a non-pandemic situation?”

But despite challenges, some experts say that the pandemic-era remote work experiment was more successful than anyone could have guessed (Credit: Getty Images)

Nicholas Bloom, professor of economics at Stanford University in California, points to “three golden rules” that, pre-pandemic, were believed to be crucial for successful remote work. First, having a working space that wasn’t the same room as where you slept; second, having high-speed broadband; third, six or more months of experience on the job so that you knew what you were doing.

The pandemic proved all three were, in fact, not required – and if it weren’t for the unique nature of the pandemic, we never would have been able to figure that out, says Bloom. Now, moving forwards, we can look at the difficult remote-work conditions during the pandemic, and use what we’ve learned to improve our set-ups. Bloom says he thinks it’s “incredibly positive” that pandemic remote work has been “more successful than anyone ever predicted”.

He suggests that the forced remote-work experiment is like comparing two versions of a smartphone. Say you bought an original smartphone years ago, and thought it was convenient at the time, but then one day you buy the newest, shiniest model, and suddenly realised how much more convenient it is than the original. That’s what remote work after Covid-19 could be like – we’ll only be able to improve and iterate on what was surprisingly successful during the pandemic.

Bloom also believes that, without the unique pressure-cooker environment of the pandemic, there wouldn’t have been as many leaps in remote-work technological innovation. He and his colleagues point out in a 2021 working paper that the number of US patent applications for technologies supporting telework, video conferencing and working from home <a dir="ltr" href="https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BFI_WP_2020133.pdf">doubled between January and September 2020 </a>. Even “Zoom is a lot better now than a few months ago”, says Bloom.

Kevin Johnson, associate professor of management at HEC Montréal business school, says that the pandemic gave remote work a wave it wouldn’t have had otherwise. “We’ve got the momentum to use in the coming months, weeks, to try and build something more integrated in our management system and our leadership styles,” he says.

In the end, we can acknowledge both perspectives; that while working remotely during the pandemic distorted many people’s views of what long-term remote work would look like, the unusual ways the pandemic affected the telework experience can serve as learning points for the future.

It’s important to identify the pieces of the Great Remote Work Experiment that were unique to the pandemic. After all, we might be tempted to look at those elements, and assume that they’ll always be a part of remote work. That’s why we need to pay attention to the parts of the day-to-day that pan out better or worse than we think, and flag it with a manager early. Communication and flexibility will be key. Just because certain factors helped remote work spread more quickly than it would otherwise, doesn’t mean those factors will stick around forever.

Remote Working In A Normal World

Why the 'Great Remote Work Experiment' may have been flawed

Kitchen Offices With Zoom Fatigue

Hybrid Working Blues

Breaking The Rules

The Great Remote Work Experiment

How to work from home, the right way

The quiet, grinding loneliness of working from home

What’s the purpose of the office – and do we still need it?