After Tom Brady won his first Super Bowl in 2001, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft promoted Tom to General Manager because they wanted to see him grow with the organization. In the corporate world, it is known as talent management.
Research from Ernest O’Boyle and Herman Aguinis shows that high performers have much higher levels of impact than average performers.

Talent management

Leadership

A 2016 McKinsey report laid out that only 40% of women and 56% of men desired to become a top executive in a company. It could be because the climb is exhausting since the range of expertise and skills has expanded. It means that today&#39;s leaders need to meet an almost impossible set of requirements.
We are requiring today’s leaders to be the best player on the team, the coach, general manager, and CEO. Instead of attracting people who want to lead, we attract the narcissists that are motivated by money, power, and status.

Climbing the ladder

If we want more diversity, we need to change our assumptions that being ranked higher in a company should be the overall target. Being promoted is not always the best way to unlock potential and innovation.
We need more companies that want to let their best performers stay on the field and create paths for the leaders to inspire those stars.

Creating paths for coaches

<figure><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/1*MHX2ytsTM6NDnFe7aUD3lQ.jpeg" width="680" height="361"><figcaption class="hz ia de dc dd ib ic ar cl fm at aw" data-selectable-paragraph="" dir="ltr">Photo From <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/keithallison/3866856294/in/photolist-6TGDE7-2SUn9s-5Cuvjy-bqX48a-SZyGRZ-eUcSws-aked5x-akgZwQ-akecZx-bp6atk-4mrjeB-rbBCCA-jbtbLM-7b2cC3-akgZys-21EqJ7-tN97eL-2SPyjB-d6bnij-7b2dcq-86xSEx-ic1tzn-6TCDCn-ic1HJ5-doYSHy-nhQDZF-6THefo-5aQeH6-wRCUwh-9Wxaz1-5siBZs-xrz58M-bnjEsV-odvBDX-EDu4-bpSczH-jATpqy-ouMd9Q-u5jFBU-oduHJg-osXoMs-u5khys-sUQza-qqKTn2-NmxBDw-odvBRa-7HHQxh-t8QTRK-tN5enE-6THg79" class="cq gn id ie if ig" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">Keith Allison</a></figcaption></figure>Imagine after Tom Brady won his first Super Bowl in 2001, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft sat Brady down and told him, “Tom, you had a fantastic season. We want to see you keep growing with the organization. We are going to promote you to General Manager.”In sports, we would quickly question Kraft’s sanity. Yet, in the corporate world, we call this talent management.Google indirectly addressed this issue after trying to figure out how to keep its high performers after the IPO in 2004. They stumbled upon research from Ernest O’Boyle and Herman Aguinis showing that across a wide range of fields, human performance followed the power law: high performers are not only one or two standard deviations above the average — they have dramatically higher levels of impact than average performers. This led to changes in the way google rewarded its people.As google’s former Chief People Officer Laszlo Bock wrote in his book <a href="http://amzn.to/2ydGcS9" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">Work Rules!</a> “we have many cases where people at more “junior” levels make far more than average performers at more “senior” levels. It’s a natural result of having a greater impact, and a compensation system that recognizes that impact.”Google tells their MVPs to stay on the field.<h1 data-selectable-paragraph="">Do people even want to climb the ladder?</h1>Despite the clear signals from organizations that success and climbing the ladder go hand in hand, most people are unconvinced. McKinsey’s <a href="https://womenintheworkplace.com/" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">Women in the Workplace 2016</a> laid out this lack of desire for both women AND men.They found that only 40% of women and 56% of men had the ambition to become a top executive in a company. If we are basing our metrics of success on obtaining powerful positions, why don’t more people actually want that power?<figure><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/0*Tb5C_bQHVLtimCg4" width="680" height="536"></figure>It could be because the climb is exhausting. As companies have become <a href="https://www.bcg.com/en-us/expertise/capabilities/smart-simplicity/complicatedness-survey.aspx" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">more complex</a>, the range of functional expertise and skills has expanded. What this means for selecting today’s leaders is that they need to meet an almost impossible set of requirements.At the CEO level, the demands are even more extreme, with them having to be highly skilled in investor relations, operations, strategy, community relations, politics and on top of that, being cheerleader in chief for the organization.We are requiring today’s leaders to be the best player on the team, the coach, general manager, and CEO. Instead of attracting people that want to lead and inspire, we end up attracting those the types of people who are motivated by money, power and status — many of which happen to be <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2024577/Narcissists-rise-people-mistake-confidence-authority-leadership-qualities.html" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">narcissists</a> and <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/13/1-in-5-ceos-are-psychopaths-australian-study-finds/" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">psychopaths</a>.<h1 data-selectable-paragraph="">Creating paths for coaches</h1>Bill Belichick is seen as an incredible leader. However, in sports, that is exactly what you are looking for in a coach. In organizations, there is no coach. You have to throw 50 touchdowns before you even have the chance of leading others.<figure><img src="https://miro.medium.com/max/500/1*rMQWYOABLexGIW5K88x8tA.jpeg" width="680" height="461"><figcaption class="hz ia de dc dd ib ic ar cl fm at aw" data-selectable-paragraph="" dir="ltr">From <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/photo-tractatus/5325515373/in/photolist-97AEbz-fiZBMz-fjePfq-fjePHu-fiZwVR-96Raen-fiZAC2-bpRaaB-8o5Aju-4q3sJ5-fjeJEb-fiZBeR-bpRaDz-fjeJqu-qcPkfV-fjeLKG-6VnRC4-jGj3p3-6PtdPT-96Uzfd-q2Lbri-6LYqDW-96UCXL-96RARr-96Uxvb-8o5At3-fiZBY8-6MG9sk-fjeN7W-fiZAXZ-fiZBsD-fiZC28-cJZtRY-8o5B9s-8o5xGj-8o5AoS-fiZzz6-bgsU44-6VrUJf-8o5B73-6VnPmV-bpR8YH-6M1b4C-96UBBG-bqfhik-fjeMf1-bpRerM-fjeNSC-96UzKW-fjeJs5" class="cq gn id ie if ig" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">Flickr</a></figcaption></figure>If we want more diversity, more vibrant organizations and more fulfilling work, we need to change our assumptions that being ranked higher in a company should be the goal for everyone. Authority does not equal performance and being promoted is not always the best way to unlock creativity and innovation.We need more organizations that want to let their star quarterbacks stay on the field and create paths for the people that are driven to lead and inspire those stars.Originally published at <a href="https://think-boundless.com/tom-brady-principle-dont-promote-your-best-peopl/" rel="noopener nofollow" dir="ltr">think-boundless.com</a> on November 4, 2018.

Imagine after Tom Brady won his first Super Bowl in 2001, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft sat Brady down and told him, “Tom, you had a fantastic season. We want to see you keep growing with…

Career

Imagine after Tom Brady won his first Super Bowl in 2001, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft sat Brady down and told him, “Tom, you had a fantastic season. We want to see you keep growing with the organization. We are going to promote you to General Manager.” In sports, we would quickly question Kraft’s sanity. Yet, in the corporate world, we call this talent management. Google indirectly addressed this issue after trying to figure out how to keep its high performers after the IPO in 2004. They stumbled upon research from Ernest O’Boyle and Herman Aguinis showing that across a wide range of fields, human performance followed the power law: high performers are not only one or two standard deviations above the average — they have dramatically higher levels of impact than average performers. This led to changes in the way google rewarded its people.

As google’s former Chief People Officer Laszlo Bock wrote in his book <a dir="ltr" href="http://amzn.to/2ydGcS9" rel="noopener nofollow">Work Rules! </a>“we have many cases where people at more “junior” levels make far more than average performers at more “senior” levels. It’s a natural result of having a greater impact, and a compensation system that recognizes that impact.”

Google tells their MVPs to stay on the field. Despite the clear signals from organizations that success and climbing the ladder go hand in hand, most people are unconvinced. McKinsey’s <a dir="ltr" href="https://womenintheworkplace.com/" rel="noopener nofollow">Women in the Workplace 2016 </a>laid out this lack of desire for both women AND men. They found that only 40% of women and 56% of men had the ambition to become a top executive in a company. If we are basing our metrics of success on obtaining powerful positions, why don’t more people actually want that power? It could be because the climb is exhausting. As companies have become <a dir="ltr" href="https://www.bcg.com/en-us/expertise/capabilities/smart-simplicity/complicatedness-survey.aspx" rel="noopener nofollow">more complex </a>, the range of functional expertise and skills has expanded. What this means for selecting today’s leaders is that they need to meet an almost impossible set of requirements.

At the CEO level, the demands are even more extreme, with them having to be highly skilled in investor relations, operations, strategy, community relations, politics and on top of that, being cheerleader in chief for the organization. We are requiring today’s leaders to be the best player on the team, the coach, general manager, and CEO. Instead of attracting people that want to lead and inspire, we end up attracting those the types of people who are motivated by money, power and status — many of which happen to be <a dir="ltr" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2024577/Narcissists-rise-people-mistake-confidence-authority-leadership-qualities.html" rel="noopener nofollow">narcissists </a> and <a dir="ltr" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/13/1-in-5-ceos-are-psychopaths-australian-study-finds/" rel="noopener nofollow">psychopaths </a> .

Bill Belichick is seen as an incredible leader. However, in sports, that is exactly what you are looking for in a coach. In organizations, there is no coach. You have to throw 50 touchdowns before you even have the chance of leading others. If we want more diversity, more vibrant organizations and more fulfilling work, we need to change our assumptions that being ranked higher in a company should be the goal for everyone. Authority does not equal performance and being promoted is not always the best way to unlock creativity and innovation.

Bite‑sized knowledge
to upgrade
your career

The Tom Brady Principle: Don’t Promote Your Best People

Talent management

Climbing the ladder

Creating paths for coaches

Job Interviews Are Broken. There's a Way to Fix Them.

How to Reimagine the Second Half of Your Career

Having the Urge to Make a Big Life Change? Consider These 3 Things

Bite‑sized knowledgeto upgradeyour career

The Tom Brady Principle: Don’t Promote Your Best People

Talent management

Climbing the ladder

Creating paths for coaches

Job Interviews Are Broken. There's a Way to Fix Them.

How to Reimagine the Second Half of Your Career

Having the Urge to Make a Big Life Change? Consider These 3 Things

Bite‑sized knowledge
to upgrade
your career